VT · rules
Vt. Memo to the Bar, July 6, 2021
Memo to Bar - July 6 2021 - Changes to Administrative Directive Regarding Court Operations
SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
PATRICIA GABEL, ESQ. Mailing Address
State Court Administrator Office of the Court Administrator
patricia.gabel@vermont.gov 109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609-0701
www.vermontjudiciary.org
TO: Members of the Vermont Bar
FROM: Patricia Gabel, Esq., State Court Administrator
RE: Changes to Administrative Directive Regarding Court Operations
DATE: July 6, 2021
On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court amended Administrative Order 49 and acknowledged the
Court Administrator’s authority to issue directives regarding access to and conduct in Judiciary
buildings, including requirements related to screening, social distancing, and masks, as
reasonably necessary to mitigate risk to the health of court users or court personnel.
Pursuant to this authority, Administrative Directive No. PG-13 has been amended regarding the
protocols related to the health and safety of visitors and Judiciary personnel. These changes were
made based on the advice of our infectious disease consultant and after consultation with judicial
officers, court managers, and others regarding what measures we can reasonably adopt that
would, on the one hand, enable us to expand court operations, including opening most of our
buildings to the public, while on the other hand continuing to follow reasonable protocols to
protect the health of court users and Judiciary personnel. The effective date of the change is
Tuesday, July 6, 2021.
In general, this Directive is consistent with the expectations I discussed in my email of June 18.
One area that is different, however, is the issue of the use of masks by court visitors and the use
of masks in public parts of the buildings. This slight change in direction was informed by
additional consideration of how we can balance the desire of everyone to move toward the “new
normal” after so many months of restrictive operations with the need to ensure we are operating
a safe workplace for the hundreds of people who work in courthouses and other Judiciary
facilities. As a result, following extensive discussions, Administrative Directive No. PG-13 sets
forth the general rule that masks must be worn by all courthouse visitors at all times within
the courthouse and that social distancing of at least six feet must be maintained to the
extent possible. There are certain exceptions to the general rule described in the Directive. One
example is that judicial officers presiding over a trial or hearing may, in their discretion, modify
the masking and distancing requirements under certain circumstances as described in the
Directive. Another example is that Judiciary personnel who have been Fully Vaccinated and
have had their vaccination certified by Human Resources do not need to wear masks in the
employee-only areas of the courthouse. There are other exceptions described in the Directive.
Most of our courthouses have mechanical ventilation that has been assessed and approved by
mechanical engineers. Courthouses without approved mechanical ventilation will require
additional mitigation, such as the use of HEPA filtration, CO2 monitoring, and capacity limits. A
list of courthouses that are not yet open to the public can be found on the Judiciary website at
this link: https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/about-vermont-judiciary/covid-19-and-court-
operations
This list is updated as courthouses are cleared to open.
The full text of the amended directive is available on the judiciary website.
State Court Administrator Directive PG-13 – Amended July 6, 2021
As circumstances change, the judiciary will continue to modify its protocols. Thank you for your
cooperation and commitment to justice.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
2d708ba9cce91fabf2c834a71984f9262337cb2920ba2e87077f389ec7d96063
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.