VT · rules
Vt. Memo to the Bar, June 18, 2021
Memo to Bar - June 18, 2021 - Update on COVID-19 Pandemic Measures
SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
PATRICIA GABEL, ESQ. Mailing Address
State Court Administrator Office of the Court Administrator
patricia.gabel@vermont.gov 109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609-0701
www.vermontjudiciary.org
TO: Members of the Vermont Bar
FROM: Patricia Gabel, Esq., State Court Administrator
RE: Update on COVID-19 Pandemic Measures
DATE: June 18, 2021
Dear Colleagues –
Over 15 months ago the Judiciary began implementing safety measures in response to the
COVID-19 pandemic to keep employees, litigants, and the general public safe. The initial
response was based on little data and our measures have adapted as our knowledge has increased
and conditions have changed. It now appears that we are emerging from the pandemic and that
some of the temporary measures we have employed during the pandemic will indeed be
temporary and that other changes we made that appeared to be improvements will be adopted on
a permanent basis.
The Governor’s emergency order regarding COVID protocols expired because Vermont
achieved an 80% vaccination rate. While this is a major milestone for all Vermonters, it is
important to note that the judicial emergency is still in effect per the Supreme Court
administrative order. Many people in the courthouse are required to be there and do not have
control over the duration of their visit. Those factors make measures necessary to protect those
in courts very different from the measures taken generally for other businesses. Our protocols
will be phasing out, but on a different timetable than that established by the Governor. Below is a
summary of some changes we are making and will continue to make as we emerge from this
public health crisis.
The members of the bar have been an integral part of the Judiciary’s ability to quickly adapt to
changing circumstances and to continue to provide critical services for Vermonters during the
pandemic. Thank you for your adaptability, your cooperation, your patience, and your
commitment to justice.
Sincerely,
Pat
MASK POLICY
In June, the Judiciary modified its mask policy to make masks optional for fully vaccinated
employees, vendors, and contractors in the private areas of the courthouse. This policy will be
further amended in the very near future when the appropriate conditions warrant. We are guided
by our consultant, Dr. Erin Bromage, who is an expert in infectious diseases and has provided
advice to us and many other courts during the pandemic. Given current indicators, we MAY
issue a modification of the mask policy on Tuesday, July 6, at least in HVAC-ventilated
buildings, if positive statistical trends continue, to the following:
• In all areas of the courthouse, masks are required if you are not fully vaccinated.
• Masks are optional if you are fully vaccinated.
• If you take your mask off in a courthouse, you are attesting that you are fully
vaccinated.
PLEXIGLASS
The use of plexiglass in the courtrooms is no longer required and can be used at the discretion of
each court.
CLERK WINDOWS
We currently anticipate that clerk windows will be opened to the public in most buildings on July
6.
NON-HVAC COURTHOUSES
Some court buildings are not approved for in-person hearings due to no or insufficient HVAC
ventilation. Addison, Rutland county courthouse, and the Supreme Court have HVAC systems
and are expected to be approved in the next few weeks. For the other courthouses that lack
HVAC systems or have systems that cannot be easily upgraded, the Judiciary has employed a
construction project manager and mechanical engineer to determine mitigation efforts that might
allow smaller in-person hearings. Those plans will involve HEPA filters, open windows, and
CO2 monitors, along with restrictions on the number of people and duration of use for the largest
courtrooms. We do expect at least some of these buildings to be able to be available to conduct
limited in-person hearings within a few weeks.
IN-PERSON HEARINGS
The judiciary will continue to use remote hearings when appropriate, including for those
proceedings already scheduled for remote hearing. Temporary guidelines are being developed
by Judge Grearson and me, with support from the Oversight Committees and in consultation
with court management. These will allow for a gradual expansion of in-person operations, rather
than an all-at-once approach. These guidelines will take into account various building-related
limitations and identify general principles. The Oversight Committees have been working on
division- and docket- specific suggestions regarding which proceedings are better suited for
remote proceedings and which proceedings are better suited for in-person proceedings.
The Supreme Court is in the process of establishing a Special Advisory Committee on Remote
Hearings to take a much more in-depth look at the operational and policy issues concerning the
conduct of remote hearings. The work of this Committee will inform changes in operations and
policies regarding remote hearings in the future.
CO2 MONITORS AND HEPA FILTERS
We continue to purchase CO2 monitors to be used in each courtroom.
The Judiciary will take necessary precautions on a site-by-site basis, which may include
limitations on room capacity and/or duration of hearings and continued use of masks and social
distancing. These decisions will be dictated by a multitude of factors, including HVAC
capabilities, COVID prevalence in the community, and health guidance.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
e45238853c0ce01716e737365b9460ee7ef3cc85b5752486568fa5853b212bd5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.