VT · rules
Vt. Memo to the Bar, Dec. 11, 2019
Memo to Bar - December 11, 2019 - Promulgated, Proposed Rules and Miscellaneous Info
SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
PATRICIA GABEL, ESQ. Mailing Address
State Court Administrator Office of the Court Administrator
patricia.gabel@vermont.gov 109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609-0701
Telephone (802) 828-3278
FAX: 802 828-3457
www.vermontjudiciary.org
TO: Members of the Vermont Bar
FROM: Patricia Gabel, Esq., State Court Administrator
RE: Promulgated, Proposed Rules and Miscellaneous Information
DATE: December 11, 2019
For your information, please find the following information:
• Order Promulgating the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing
• Order Promulgating Amendments to Rules 3, 5, 5.1, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 28, 30, and 45.1 of the Vermont Rules
of Appellate Procedure
• Order Promulgating Amendments to Rules 5 and 79 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 5 and
79 of the Vermont Rules of Probate Procedure
• Order Promulgating Amendments to Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings 3, 4, and 5, Vermont
Rules of Civil Procedure 4, 10, 44.2, 45, 77, and 79.1, Vermont Rule of Probate Procedure 4 and 79.1, and
Vermont Rule for Family Proceedings 15
• Proposed Order Amending Rule 807 of the Vermont Rules of Evidence
• Updated Court Forms
• Obligations Under A.O. 41
• eCabinet Registration
I. PROMULGATED RULE AMENDMENTS
a. Order Promulgating the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing
This Order was promulgated on December 10, 2019; effective March 2, 2020.
The 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing are designed to conform to the upcoming new
Judiciary case management system (CMS). The CMS will have electronic filing and electronic
casefiles and will be rolled out over time in the superior courts and the judicial bureau. Additions to
these rules will be made when the new CMS is rolled out for the Supreme Court and other judiciary
entities. The existing 2010 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing, which were designed for eCabinet,
will remain in effect and applicable to dockets where they are currently in use. Once the new CMS
is rolled out in all the locations and dockets where eCabinet has been employed, the 2010 rules will
be repealed.
Extensive instructions will supplement the rules and will often appear on screens for electronic
filing and the viewing of electronic case files. The user must follow these instructions for electronic
filing, service after commencement, and viewing of files. In addition to the efiling system, the
public and parties will be able to view electronic case files, either by remote access and/or on
terminals at court houses, through a public portal. To view nonpublic documents a separate
registration for that portal and approval of elevated status will be required.
The adoption of these rules is coordinated with the adoption of extensive amendments to the
Vermont Rules for Public Access to Court Records to enable, with necessary restrictions, the public
and filers to view electronic case files when a filing is accepted. Those rules contain specific
directions for filers to comply with requirements making certain records and information
inaccessible to the public. Filers should consult the public access rules, as well as these rules, to be
sure a filing complies.
b. Order Promulgating Amendments to Rules 3, 5, 5.1, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 28, 30, and 45.1 of the
Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure
This Order was promulgated on December 10, 2019; effective March 2, 2020.
The amendments to the appellate rules update language in anticipation of the new case
management system, which will be rolled out in phases throughout the state concurrent with
electronic filing and electronic case files. The rollout will initially be in divisions of the superior
court, and the Supreme Court will be at the end of the rollout period. The amendments to the
appellate rules are made to accommodate appeals from cases that were filed under the new case
management system and have electronic case files. When the case management system is
implemented in the Supreme Court, the appellate rules will be amended further. The rules are
amended in several places to use “transmit” instead of “mail” to allow electronic or other types of
transmission of documents. The term “docket entries” is replaced with the more general term
“record of actions.” Various rules have been amended to clarify when references are to the 2010
Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing.
Rules 28 and 30 are amended to specify how to refer to the record in cases filed under the 2020
Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing and to clarify that no printed case is required when there is an
electronic case file under either the 2010 or 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing. In cases with
no electronic case file, a printed case must still be filed.
c. Order Promulgating Amendments to Rules 5 and 79 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure
and Rules 5 and 79 of the Vermont Rules of Probate Procedure
This Order was promulgated on December 10, 2019; effective March 2, 2020.
The amendments to V.R.C.P. 5 and V.R.P.P. 5 are made to conform the rules to the 2020
Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing. The amendments explain the certificate of service
requirements when documents are filed under the new efiling rules. The amendments clarify when
references are to the 2010 Vermont Rules of Electronic Filing.
The amendment removes V.R.C.P. 79(a)(1) and V.R.P.P. 79(c) because the custodian of records
is as specified in V.R.P.A.C.R. 3(c), effective July 1, 2019.
d. Order Promulgating Amendments to Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings 3,
4, and 5, Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure 4, 10, 44.2, 45, 77, and 79.1, Vermont Rule of
Probate Procedure 4 and 79.1, and Vermont Rule for Family Proceedings 15
This Order was promulgated on December 10, 2019; effective March 2, 2020.
The amendments to various rules are designed to conform the rules to the adoption of the new
case management system and the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing. The new case
management will be rolled out across the state in phases. Until the new case management system
and electronic filing are fully implemented, different divisions of the superior court will be
operating under different electronic filing rules. The Environmental Division currently has
electronic filing under the 2010 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing and so references are amended
to specify that those rules are applicable. After the Court Administrator directs that electronic filing
under the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing will begin in the Environmental Division, the
2010 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing will no longer apply, and the Rules for Environmental
Court Proceedings will require revision. The amendments clarify when cross references in the
environmental, civil, probate, and family rules are to the 2010 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing.
II. PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENTS
(NOTE: THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN PROPOSED AND HAVE NOT
BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT.)
Proposed Order Amending Rule 807 of the Vermont Rules of Evidence
This proposed amendment responds to the Vermont Supreme Court’s decision in State v.
Bergquist, 2019 VT 17, __ Vt. __, 211 A.3d 946, by correcting Rule 807’s constitutional
deficiencies described therein. The proposed amendments to subdivisions (c) and (f) ensure the
Rule comports with the minimum constitutional standard set in Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836
(1990), as interpreted in Bergquist.
In criminal cases, the rule balances an important public policy interest—protecting certain
witnesses in defined, vulnerable categories, from the trauma of testifying—against the defendant’s
constitutional right to confront accusers. To comport with the Sixth Amendment, as interpreted in
Craig, the proposed amendment requires the court to make its findings at least by preponderance of
the evidence, without precluding argument for the application of a stricter standard of evidence. To
make the showing of necessity for these proceedings, the proposal requires the State to show that
the witness would be traumatized not by the courtroom or other aspects of providing testimony, but
by the presence of the defendant (or by defendant’s image when subdivision (e) applies). The State
must also show that the witness would suffer a level of emotional trauma that is more than mere
nervousness, excitement, or some reluctance to testify.
The proposed amendment to subdivision (a) corrects an unintended effect of an amendment made
in 2015. The purpose of that amendment was to make the rule consistent with the Legislature’s
efforts to eliminate offensive language from the Vermont Statutes, however, the term “psychiatric
disability” provided by 1 V.S.A. § 147 encompasses a wider arc of impairments than the original
term used by the Rule, which was “mental illness,” as still defined in 18 V.S.A. § 7101(14). Thus,
the language is amended to again refer to “mental illness.”
Comments on these proposed amendments should be sent by February 10, 2020, to Elizabeth
Miller, Esq., Chair of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence, at the following address:
Elizabeth Miller, Esq.
Dunkiel Saunders
91 College Street
Burlington, VT 05401
emiller@dunkielsaunders.com
III. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Court Forms
Court forms are constantly being updated. Please refer to the judiciary website for the most up-to-date forms. https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/court-forms.
Please use the link below to report any form question, concern or issue
http://www.vermontjudiciary.org/website-feedback-form or you can access our Website Feedback
program at the bottom of each web page
b. Obligation under A.O. 41
Attorneys are reminded that an “attorney must report to the State Court Administrator within thirty
days any change of the office mailing or electronic mail address” and that “[n]otice sent to a reported
address is sufficient even if not received by the attorney because of failure to report the proper
address or failure of delivery not caused by the court.” A.O. 41, § 4(c); see A.O. 44, § 1.
Please email those changes to JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov. Your cooperation is very much
appreciated.
To ensure you continue to receive these emails, please add JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov to
your Safe Senders list.
c. eCabinet Registration
Administrative Order No. 44 requires attorneys in active status to register up to three email
addresses in eCabinet for purposes of receiving notices of hearing and other documents. You may
include staff email addresses in the three email addresses that you specify. eCabinet registration is
required whether you practice in court or not.
If you have already registered in eCabinet, the email address(es) you provided as part of that
process will be used.
If you have not already registered in eCabinet, please go to
https://efiling.eservices.crt.state.vt.us/, click Register Now, and follow the simple prompts.
Attorneys will need their attorney license numbers to register. Helpful information about the
Attorney Email Registration process is also available on the Electronic Filing page of the judiciary
website at https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/about-vermont-judiciary/electronic-access/electronic-filing. Please contact jud.helpdesk@vermont.gov or call the Helpdesk at 802-828-4357 with any
questions in the meantime.
You are also reminded that you are required to update the email address(es) and other contact
information you have registered as soon as there are any changes, including changes to staff email
addresses you may have included with your registration. To revise the information, please go to
https://efiling.eservices.crt.state.vt.us/, log into eCabinet, click “Account,” choose “My Profile,”
and make the necessary changes to your contact information.
Notification to JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov or in eCabinet of a change to your contact
information does not automatically notify the other. It is your responsibility to notify both. If you
are a member of the Vermont Bar Association, you will also need to separately notify the VBA.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
3a8da4a46d03d5b1b682b2a29d9f56d286119996b1ec5541b833fc32f56f1e9c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.