VT · rules
Vt. Memo to the Bar, Dec. 17, 2018
Memo to Bar - December 17, 2018 - Appellate Bench-Bar Meeting, Proposed Rule Amendments, List of Approved Financial Institutions and Miscellaneous Information
SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
PATRICIA GABEL, ESQ. Mailing Address
State Court Administrator Office of the Court Administrator
patricia.gabel@vermont.gov 109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609-0701
Telephone (802) 828-3278
FAX: 802 828-3457
www.vermontjudiciary.org
TO: Members of the Vermont Bar
FROM: Patricia Gabel, Esq., State Court Administrator
RE: Appellate Bench-Bar Meeting, Proposed Rule Amendments, List of Approved
Financial Institutions and Miscellaneous Information
DATE: December 17, 2018
For your information, please find the following information:
• Appellate Bench-Bar Meeting
• Proposed Order Amending Rule 26(b)(5)(A) of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure
• Proposed Order Amending Rules 55 and 80.1 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure
• Proposed Order Amending Rule 41 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure
• List of Approved Financial Institutions
• Updated Court Forms
• Obligations Under A.O. 41
• eCabinet Registration
I. APPELLATE BENCH-BAR MEETING
Please bring your lunch and join the Vermont Supreme Court for an appellate bench-bar meeting
on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 from 12:00-1:30 p.m. in the Supreme Court courtroom at 111 State
St. in Montpelier. There will be a question-and-answer period, but if you have suggestions for the
agenda, please contact Emily Wetherell, Deputy Clerk of the Supreme Court, at
emily.wetherell@vermont.gov.
II. PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENTS
(NOTE: THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN PROPOSED AND HAVE NOT
BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT.)
a. Proposed Order Amending Rule 26(b)(5)(A) of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure
The proposed amendment to Rule 26(b)(5)(A) adapts the language of F.R.C.P. 26(a)(2)(A) for
the provision of the Vermont Rule identifying expert witnesses whose identity must be disclosed in
response to an interrogatory. The amended rule applies to “each person” who may be used at trial to
present expert testimony under Vermont Rules of Evidence 702, 703, and 705. To remove
uncertainty regarding whether this requirement applies to witnesses whose testimony falls within
those Evidence Rules but who were not specially retained to develop their opinions, the proposed
amendment makes clear that Rule 26(b)(5) applies “whether or not the witness may also testify from
personal knowledge as to any fact in issue in the case.”
Comments on these proposed amendments should be sent by February 19, 2019, to Allan
Keyes, Esq., Chair of Advisory Committee on the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, at the
following address:
Allan Keyes, Esq., Chair
Civil Rules Committee
Ryan Smith & Carbine, Ltd.
P.O. Box 310
Rutland, VT 05702 0310
ark@rsclaw.com
b. Proposed Order Amending Rules 55 and 80.1 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure
The proposed amendment conforms Rule 55 to reflect the needs of current practice. The
proposal deletes the requirement of subdivision (a) for a separate entry of default by the clerk in
favor of a provision allowing the party seeking relief to file a motion for default judgment to
initiate the process.
The proposed amendment to Rule 55(a) follows the federal rule by deleting “as provided by
these rules,” so that an indication of an intent to defend, even if not in compliance with the rules,
does not trigger a default.
The proposed amendment deletes the first sentence of Rule 55(b)(1) requiring an application
to the court for a default judgment because it is superfluous in light of the provision for a motion
added to subdivision (a). The proposed addition of a sentence to paragraph (1) makes clear that
the party seeking a default judgment has the burden on the issue of minority and must disclose
any information in that party’s possession on the issue of competency.
The proposed amendment to Rule 55(b)(2) eliminates the formal reference to entry of
judgment by the clerk. The proposal changes the time for notice in Rule 55(b)(4) from five to
seven days. The proposal makes other minor wording changes in Rule 55(b) and (c) for
consistency.
The proposed amendment to Rule 80.1(c) provides consistency with the simultaneous
proposed amendment of Rule 55(a).
Comments on these proposed amendments should be sent by February 19, 2019, to Allan
Keyes, Esq., Chair of Advisory Committee on the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, at the
following address:
Allan Keyes, Esq., Chair
Civil Rules Committee
Ryan Smith & Carbine, Ltd.
P.O. Box 310
Rutland, VT 05702 0310
ark@rsclaw.com
c. Proposed Order Amending Rule 41 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure
At the request of the Civil Division Oversight Committee, the proposed amendments to Rule
41(a) and (b) reorganize the rule and conform it to current practice and eliminate outdated
terminology.
The proposed amendment to Rule 41(a)(1) retains, with some clarification of language, the
existing provision of Rule 41(a)(1)(i) that an action may be dismissed without order of court if a
notice of voluntary dismissal is filed at any time before an answer or motion for summary
judgment has been filed. The proposed addition of “claim” makes clear that, as now provided in
new paragraph (a)(5), one or more claims that have been joined in a single action may be
dismissed without dismissal of the entire action.
The proposal separates provisions of former paragraph (a)(1) into new paragraphs (a)(2)-(6).
Proposed new paragraph (a)(2) carries forward the provision of Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) that a
stipulation of dismissal signed by all appearing parties may be filed at any time. Proposed new
paragraph (a)(3) carries forward the first and final sentences of former paragraph (a)(2)
concerning dismissal by order of the court with a language clarification. Proposed new
paragraph (a)(4) is the second sentence of former paragraph (a)(2) concerning counterclaims,
with a language clarification. Proposed new paragraph (a)(5), permitting dismissal of some or all
claims, is carried forward without change from former paragraph (a)(1). Proposed new
paragraph (a)(6) carries forward the final sentence of former paragraph (a)(1) concerning
adjudication on the merits.
The proposed amendment deletes former Rule 41(b)(1)(i), providing for involuntary
dismissal of an action on a trial list that has been pending more than two years. The proposal
renumbers former subparagraphs (b)(ii) and (iii) as (i) and (ii) and shortens their time periods to
allow more expeditious elimination of stale actions. Proposed language has been added in (b)(ii)
to make clear that the shorter time periods may be extended by the court and that dismissal may
be entered against defendants who have not been served, leaving the action pending against those
who have been served.
Comments on these proposed amendments should be sent by February 19, 2019, to Allan
Keyes, Esq., Chair of Advisory Committee on the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, at the
following address:
Allan Keyes, Esq., Chair
Civil Rules Committee
Ryan Smith & Carbine, Ltd.
P.O. Box 310
Rutland, VT 05702 0310
ark@rsclaw.com
III. LIST OF APPROVED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
a. List of Approved Financial Institutions
Rule 1.15B(a)(1) of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct requires lawyers to maintain
their trust accounts only in financial institutions approved by the Professional Responsibility
Board. Financial institutions which have not been so approved may obtain information as to how
to become certified by contacting the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (802) 859-3000. For a
complete list of Approved Financial Institutions, please click on the following link and select
“Attorney Trust Accounts”:
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/about-vermont-judiciary/boards-and-commitees/professional-responsibility
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Court Forms
Court forms are constantly being updated. Please refer to the judiciary website for the most
up-to-date forms. https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/court-forms
b. Obligation under A.O. 41
Attorneys are reminded that an “attorney must report to the State Court Administrator within
thirty days any change of the office mailing or electronic mail address” and that “[n]otice sent to a
reported address is sufficient even if not received by the attorney because of failure to report the
proper address or failure of delivery not caused by the court.” A.O. 41, § 4(c); see A.O. 44, § 1.
Please email those changes to JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov. Your cooperation is very
much appreciated.
To ensure you continue to receive these emails, please add JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov
to your Safe Senders list.
c. eCabinet Registration
Administrative Order No. 44 requires attorneys in active status to register up to three email
addresses in eCabinet for purposes of receiving notices of hearing and other documents. You
may include staff email addresses in the three email addresses that you specify. eCabinet
registration is required whether you practice in court or not.
If you have already registered in eCabinet, the email address(es) you provided as part of that
process will be used.
If you have not already registered in eCabinet, please go to
https://efiling.eservices.crt.state.vt.us/, click Register Now, and follow the simple prompts.
Attorneys will need their attorney license numbers to register. Helpful information about the
Attorney Email Registration process is also available on the Electronic Filing page of the
judiciary website at https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/about-vermont-judiciary/electronic-
access/electronic-filing. Please contact jud.helpdesk@vermont.gov or call the Helpdesk at 802-
828-4357 with any questions in the meantime.
You are also reminded that you are required to update the email address(es) and other contact
information you have registered as soon as there are any changes, including changes to staff
email addresses you may have included with your registration. To revise the information, please
go to https://efiling.eservices.crt.state.vt.us/, log into eCabinet, click “Account,” choose “My
Profile,” and make the necessary changes to your contact information.
Notification to JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov or in eCabinet of a change to your contact
information does not automatically notify the other. It is your responsibility to notify both. If you
are a member of the Vermont Bar Association, you will also need to separately notify the VBA.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
9232343430d8429a89ca64c7180e8475a563f5a2030e2ca75eaab5c3f4e7d88f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.