VT · rules
Vt. Memo to the Bar, Mar. 8, 2018
Memo to Bar - March 8, 2018 - Proposed Rule Amendments and Miscellaneous Information
SUPREME CO URT O F VERMO NT
O FFICE O F THE CO URT ADMINISTRATO R
PATRICIA GAB EL, ESQ. Mailing Address
State Court Administrator Office of the Court Administrator
patricia.gabel@vermont.gov 109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609-0701
Telephone (802) 828-3278
FAX: 802 828-3457
www.vermontjudiciary.org
TO: Members of the Vermont Bar
FROM: Patricia Gabel, State Court Administrator
RE: Proposed Rule Amendments and Miscellaneous Information
DATE: March 9, 2018
For your information, please find the following information:
• Proposed Order Amending Rules 3 and 5(e) of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure and
Rule 25(a)(2)(C) of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure
• Proposed Order Amending Rule 42 of the Vermont Rules of Criminal Procedure
• Proposed Order Amending Rule 17(a) of the Vermont Rules of Criminal Procedure
• Proposed Order Amending Rule 23(d) of the Vermont Rules of Criminal Procedure
• Updated Court Forms
• Obligations Under A.O. 41
• eCabinet Registration
I. PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENTS
(NOTE: THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN PROPOSED BY THE
COMMITTEES OR BOARDS AND HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY THE SUPREME
COURT.)
a. Proposed Order Amending Rules 3 and 5(e) of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure and
Rule 25(a)(2)(C) of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure
The proposed amendment redesignates the present Rule 3 as Rule 3(a) and adds Rule 3(b) to
provide a “prisoner mailbox” procedure for the filing of a complaint in a civil action by an inmate
confined in an institution. The proposed amendment is virtually identical to V.R.A.P. 4(f), adopted
effective March 13, 2017.
Proposed simultaneous amendments adding V.R.C.P. 5(e)(4) and V.R.A.P. 25(a)(2)(C) establish
an identical procedure for inmate filing of documents after the complaint that are required to be filed
by V.R.C.P. 5 and papers after the notice of appeal required to be filed by V.R.A.P. 25.
Comments on this proposed amendment should be sent by May 9, 2018, to Allan Keyes,
Chair of the Civil Rules Committee, at the following address:
Allan Keyes, Esq., Chair
Civil Rules Committee
Ryan Smith & Carbine, Ltd.
P.O. Box 310
Rutland, VT 05702 0310
ark@rsclaw.com
b. Proposed Order Amending Rule 42 of the Vermont Rules of Criminal Procedure
The proposed amendment to Rule 42, governing contempt process, reorganizes and
substantively amends the rule in three instances. A provision is added for notice to the defendant
of the maximum penalty that may be imposed upon conviction. To facilitate appearance of
counsel and assignment of counsel to represent the indigent defendant, a requirement is added to
provide notice of the right to be represented by counsel and to make application for assignment
of counsel. Specific provision is also made for the mode of appointment of a prosecuting
attorney.
Comments on this proposed amendment should be sent by May 9, 2018, to the Honorable
Thomas A. Zonay, Chair of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure, at the
following address:
Honorable Thomas A. Zonay, Chair
Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure
Vermont Superior Court
Rutland Criminal Family Unit
9 Merchants Row
Rutland, VT 05701
Thomas.zonay@vermont.gov
c. Proposed Order Amending Rule 17(a) of the Vermont Rules of Criminal Procedure
The proposed amendment Rule 17(a) expands the categories of persons who are authorized
to issue subpoenas in criminal proceedings, either for attendance of witnesses or for production
of documentary evidence and objects. This subdivision was amended effective February 20,
2017 to clarify that a subpoena is provided by the clerk, but actually issued by a judicial officer,
subject to certain notice of rights on the part of persons subject to subpoena to object thereto, and
the procedures for doing so. The proposed amendment provides that subpoenas in criminal cases
may now be issued either by a judicial officer, a clerk, or a member of the Vermont bar. The
amendment is intended to facilitate issuance of subpoenas in criminal cases, consistent with a
defendant’s Compulsory Process guarantees, subject to the existing provisions of the rule
establishing protections for persons and records that are the subject of subpoenas. The
amendment is also intended to establish greater conformity with V.R.C.P. 45(a)(3), which has
long provided that subpoenas in civil proceedings may be issued by either a judicial officer, a
clerk, or an attorney.
Comments on this proposed amendment should be sent by May 9, 2018, to the Honorable
Thomas A. Zonay, Chair of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure, at the
following address:
Honorable Thomas A. Zonay, Chair
Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure
Vermont Superior Court
Rutland Criminal Family Unit
9 Merchants Row
Rutland, VT 05701
Thomas.zonay@vermont.gov
d. Proposed Order Amending Rule 23(d) of the Vermont Rules of Criminal Procedure
The proposed amendment to Rule 23(d) is in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in
State v. Breed, where the Court outlined the better practice when there may be a delay after the
jury has been chosen but before trial.
Comments on this proposed amendment should be sent by May 9, 2018, to the Honorable
Thomas A. Zonay, Chair of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure, at the
following address:
Honorable Thomas A. Zonay, Chair
Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure
Vermont Superior Court
Rutland Criminal Family Unit
9 Merchants Row
Rutland, VT 05701
Thomas.zonay@vermont.gov
II. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Court Forms
Court forms are constantly being updated. Please refer to the judiciary website for the most
up-to-date forms. https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/court-forms
b. Obligation under A.O. 41
Attorneys are reminded that an “attorney must report to the State Court Administrator within
thirty days any change of the office mailing or electronic mail address” and that “[n]otice sent to a
reported address is sufficient even if not received by the attorney because of failure to report the
proper address or failure of delivery not caused by the court.” A.O. 41, § 4(c); see A.O. 44, § 1.
Please email those changes to JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov. Your cooperation is very
much appreciated.
To ensure you continue to receive these emails, please add JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov
to your Safe Senders list.
c. eCabinet Registration
Administrative Order No. 44 requires attorneys in active status to register up to three email
addresses in eCabinet for purposes of receiving notices of hearing and other documents. You
may include staff email addresses in the three email addresses that you specify. eCabinet
registration is required whether you practice in court or not.
If you have already registered in eCabinet, the email address(es) you provided as part of that
process will be used.
If you have not already registered in eCabinet, please go to
https://efiling.eservices.crt.state.vt.us/, click Register Now, and follow the simple prompts.
Attorneys will need their attorney license numbers to register. Helpful information about the
Attorney Email Registration process is also available on the Electronic Filing page of the
judiciary website at https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/about-vermont-judiciary/electronic-
access/electronic-filing. Please contact jud.helpdesk@vermont.gov or call the Helpdesk at 802-
828-4357 with any questions in the meantime.
You are also reminded that you are required to update the email address(es) and other contact
information you have registered as soon as there are any changes, including changes to staff
email addresses you may have included with your registration. To revise the information, please
go to https://efiling.eservices.crt.state.vt.us/, log into eCabinet, click “Account,” choose “My
Profile,” and make the necessary changes to your contact information.
Notification to JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov or in eCabinet of a change to your contact
information does not automatically notify the other. It is your responsibility to notify both. If you
are a member of the Vermont Bar Association, you will also need to separately notify the VBA.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
a9e950c6d2831e2387ba9b40e8e97e7b5b2f8e0a51f8bd20d7783915e2a0668e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.