VT · rules
Vt. MCLE Rule 5
ACCREDITATION
(A) Accreditation of Programs.
(1) Requirement of Accreditation. Except as provided in Rule 5(B), all programs must be
accredited to satisfy the requirements of these Rules.
(2) Application. To request accreditation for a program not previously accredited, the
Sponsor or an attorney participating in the program must file a written application with the
Board on a form approved by the Board.
(a) Timing. The application must be filed no later than 30 days after the program has
ended, except that an application for the accreditation of an activity described in Rule 3(B)(1)
must be filed and approved before the activity commences. A Sponsor or attorney who files a
request for credit more than 30 days after the date of attendance must pay a late fee pending
approval of the out-of-time request.
(b) Contents. The application must contain the following information:
(i) The name and address of the Sponsor;
(ii) The title, date, location, and fee for the program;
(iii) The name of the presenter(s) and their qualifications;
(iv) A description of program content and length of presentation;
(v) An indication of any part pertaining to Ethics, Attorney Wellness, and
Diversity and Inclusion Programming; and
(vi) A description of the materials.
(c) Program Brochure. The Sponsor or attorney requesting accreditation may supply
the required program information by attaching a copy of the program brochure.
(3) Approval.
(a) Denial. The Board must grant the request for accreditation unless it finds that the
program:
(i) is not eligible for accreditation under Rule 4;
(ii) is sponsored by a Sponsor lacking the ability or intention to produce CLE
Programming of the kind proposed of sufficiently high quality to improve or maintain
an attorney’s professional competence; or
(iii) is not offered in a sufficiently organized fashion or under otherwise
adequate circumstances to fulfill the objectives of these Rules.
(b) Scope of Approval. The Board may grant approval for either a specific program
or a series of programs.
(c) Ongoing Approval. The Board may approve on an ongoing basis programs given
annually, subject to revocation after notice by the Board.
(d) Number Credit Hours. The Board must assign a maximum number of Credit
Hours to each accredited program.
(e) In-House CLE Programming. In-House Sponsors are treated the same as other
Sponsors and In-House CLE Programming is allowed full accreditation if the program
satisfies the other accreditation requirements outlined herein.
(3) Representations by Sponsor. If the Board approves a program, the Sponsor is entitled to
so state and to state the maximum number of Credit Hours for which the program has been
approved.
(4) List of Approved Programs. The Director will maintain a list of approved programs.
(B) Accreditation of Sponsors.
(1) General. On its own or upon application from a Sponsor, the Board may designate a
Sponsor as an “Accredited Sponsor” if the Board determines that the Sponsor regularly provides a
significant volume of CLE programs that meet the standards of approval and that the Sponsor
will maintain and submit the required records. A program produced by an Accredited Sponsor is
approved for MCLE credit without the need of the Sponsor to seek prior approval under Rule
5(A), so long as the program complies with the other accreditation requirements outlined
herein.
(2) Application and Board Approval. An application to become an Accredited Sponsor must
be made in writing and state the Sponsor’s legal education history for the preceding two
calendar years, including dates, subjects offered, total Credit Hours of instruction presented,
and the names and qualifications of presenters. In evaluating the application, the Board will
primarily consider the Sponsor’s previous experience in sponsoring and presenting continuing
legal education activities.
(3) Advisory Opinions. An Accredited Sponsor may seek an advisory opinion from the
Director about a program’s compliance with the standards under these Rules and the proper
amount of Credit Hours to be given for the program.
(4) Reevaluation and Revocation. The Board may at any time reevaluate an Accredited
Sponsor and revoke approval if a Sponsor fails to comply with the program standards and
requirements of these Rules. If the Board finds a basis to revoke the approval, the Board will
notify the Accredited Sponsor and provide the Accredited Sponsor the opportunity to have a
hearing on possible revocation prior to making a decision on revocation. The Board’s decision is
final.
(5) List of Accredited Sponsors. The Director will maintain a list of Accredited Sponsors.
(C) Director’s Determinations and Review.
(1) Delegation of Authority. Except as provided in 4(C)(2), the Board may delegate to the
Director the authority to determine, under guidelines established by the Board, written
requests and applications for: accreditation of programs; accreditation of Sponsors; awarding of
credit for attending, teaching, or participating in approved programs; waivers; extensions of
time deadlines; and interpretations of these Regulations. The Director will issue a written
decision in response to any such request or application. The Director may consult with the
Board before rendering a decision.
(2) Limit on Delegation. The Board may not delegate to the Director the authority to
determine written requests and applications for the accreditation of Attorney Wellness and
Diversity and Inclusion programs. Such requests and applications must be reviewed by the
Board to ensure that the curriculum fulfills the purposes of the Rule 3 and the presenters are
authoritative on the subject matter.
(3) Board Review. The Sponsor or attorney making the request or application may appeal
an adverse determination by the Director to the Board, which will review the request de novo.
The Sponsor or attorney affected may present information to the Board in writing. If the Board
concludes that the Director incorrectly interpreted the facts or the provisions of the Rules, it
may take appropriate action. The Board must advise the Sponsor or attorney affected of its
decision and any action taken. The Board’s decision is final.
This rule is drawn from the prior rules §§ 5(d)-(h), 7, 8.
The accreditation process for both individual programs and
sponsors remains essentially unchanged from the prior rules. The
new rules, however, explicitly state that in-house CLE
programming is subject to the same accreditation standards as
other programming (Rule 5(A)(3)(e)). Also, the new rules remove
the requirement that the Director report and the Board review all
adverse determinations by the Director, in favor of giving the
affected sponsor/attorney the right to appeal any adverse
determination by the Director to Board for de novo review (Rule
5(C)).
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
87209550f6fd52e64354b29782f2093b29850f7bd22a81095fa3b5324e368a48
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.