VT · rules
Vt. Bar Admission Rule 9
ADMISSION BY EXAMINATION
(a) Administration of the UBE. The Uniform Bar Examination is administered twice each
year, in February and in July, on dates designated by the NCBE. The Board may administer the UBE
in Vermont or, in its discretion, may cooperate with a neighboring state that has adopted the UBE
to jointly administer the examination, so long as the examination is offered at a location reasonably
convenient to Vermont.
(b) Examination Requirements and Passing Score.
(1) Sitting for Entire Examination. An Applicant must sit for all parts of the UBE at a single
administration of the Exam.
(2) Passing Score. To pass the UBE for admission to the Vermont Bar, an Applicant must
attain a score of 270 or higher on the legacy Uniform Bar Examination or a score of 620 or
higher on the NextGen Uniform Bar Examination.
(3) Limitation on Continued Sittings. An Applicant who has failed the bar examination
four times will not be permitted to sit for the UBE in Vermont. For purposes of this rule,
attempts to achieve a passing score on the UBE count toward the limit of four regardless of
where the Applicant sat for the UBE. The four-attempt limitation may be waived upon a strong
showing, to the Board’s satisfaction, that the Applicant has substantially improved the
Applicant’s Exam preparation and there is good cause warranting the requested waiver.
(c) Application Process. To be eligible to take the Uniform Bar Examination, an Applicant
must file an Application with the Board. It is the Applicant’s burden of proof to establish
compliance with the Application process.
(1) Application Contents. Each Application must:
(A) be on the appropriate Board-approved forms;
(B) include the Applicant’s NCBE number; and
(C) include a signed authorization and release form.
(2) Deadlines for Filing. An Application must be received on or before the applicable
deadline.
(A) July Examination: Application must be received by the preceding April 15.
(B) February Examination: Application must be received by the preceding November
15.
(3) Late-Filed Application. A late-filed Application must be accompanied by an official law
school transcript and a written request to the Board seeking permission for the late filing. The
Applicant must demonstrate extraordinary circumstances to justify the late filing. The Board
has discretion to accept or deny a late-filed petition.
(4) Proving Fulfillment of Education Requirements. Before taking the Uniform Bar
Examination, the Applicant must prove fulfillment of the education requirements. The NCBE
verification will suffice to demonstrate graduation from law school, but the Board has the
discretion to request an official law school transcript to ensure compliance.
(5) Early Examination. An Applicant studying at an Approved Law School may sit for the
UBE before graduation if the Applicant has successfully completed the equivalent of five
semesters of full-time study (including academic instruction on each of the subjects tested on
the UBE) prior to taking the UBE. Before sitting for the examination, the Applicant must submit
an official law school transcript documenting that study and a letter from the law school stating
that the school has determined that the Applicant is academically prepared for early testing. To
qualify for admission, the Applicant must graduate from an Approved Law School within seven
months after sitting for the UBE. The Applicant must also satisfy all other requirements for
admission.
(6) Continuing Application. An Application is considered a continuing application,
meaning the Applicant has a duty to supplement all information provided to the Board up to
and including the date of admission to the Bar.
(7) Refiling Application. An Application must be refiled if an Applicant:
(A) does not sit for the examination as previously permitted;
(B) does not achieve a passing score on the UBE;
(C) withdraws the Application; or
(D) is denied admission. If the Applicant is denied admission after achieving a
passing score, the Applicant can use that passing exam score to satisfy the exam
requirement for admission by examination for up to 5 years after the date of the
administration of the exam.
(d) Notifying Applicants. The Board will send an informational letter to each Applicant,
which will include at least the following:
(1) The dates, times, and locations for the UBE;
(2) An anonymous identification number to be used on all examination materials;
(3) An admission ticket to be used for admission to the UBE;
(4) The rules and procedures for the administration of the UBE; and
(5) The procedure for reporting of scores.
For the February Examination, the informational letter will be sent before February 1. For the July
Examination, the informational letter will be sent before July 1.
(e) Identifying Applicants. At the examination site, Applicants are required to present
government-issued photo-identification. Applicants may also be required to have their fingerprints
taken for identification purposes.
(f) Deadline to Request Reasonable Accommodations. A request for reasonable
accommodations for the UBE must be filed no later than the Application deadline, except upon a
showing of extraordinary circumstances.
Board’s Notes—2026 Amendment
In preparation for the adoption of the NextGen bar exam, Rule
9(b)(2) is amended to set the passing score for the NextGen UBE at
620. This score represents a direct mapping from the passing score
of 270 on the legacy UBE. The Board finds that a passing score of
620 on the NextGen UBE is well-supported by the procedures used
by the NCBE to determine the mapping and is also the best way to
maintain stability in bar admissions as Vermont transitions from the
legacy UBE to the NextGen exam.
Rule 9(c)(7)(B) is also amended to incorporate the NextGen UBE
into the requirement for refiling an application.
Board’s Notes—2026 Amendment
In conjunction with an amendment to Rule 13, Rule 9(b)(1) is
deleted to remove the requirement that the exam must be taken no
later than five years after the Applicant completes the necessary
educational requirements. To the Board’s knowledge, no other
jurisdiction has such a rule. Further, in the Board’s experience,
whether an Applicant passes the bar exam is a more concrete
measure of minimal competence such that the five-years-from-graduation rule is not necessary to protect the public. Former
paragraphs 9(b)(2)-(4) are renumbered (b)(1)-(3). The binary gender
pronouns in former (b)(4) are removed.
Rule 9(c)(7)(D) is amended to allow an Applicant who obtains a
passing score on the exam but is denied admission to use that exam
score to satisfy the exam requirement for admission by examination
for up to five years from the date of the administration of the exam.
Board’s Notes—2025 Amendment
The exam application deadlines in Rule 9(c)(2)(A) and (B) are
moved two weeks earlier to April 15 and November 15,
respectively, to allow more time for the Board to process requests
for exam accommodations, including the possible use of outside
experts.
Board’s Notes—2023 Amendment
Rule 9(b)(1) is amended to clarify that an applicant must be
on active status in the other U.S. jurisdiction to qualify for the
exemption from the five-years-from-graduation requirement.
Board’s Notes—2022 Amendment
In conjunction with a similar amendment to Rule 13(d), Rule
9(b)(1) is amended to clarify what factors the Board of Bar
Examiners considers when determining whether to waive the
requirement that the bar exam be taken within five years of
graduating from law school or completing the LOS Program.
The wording in Rule 9(b)(3) regarding the passing UBE score is
also corrected to specify that an Applicant must receive a score of
270 or higher.
Board’s Notes—2021 Amendment
Rule 9(c)(5), which details the eligibility requirements to sit for
the UBE prior to graduation, is amended to require that applicants
take the academic instruction necessary to prepare for the UBE and
are approved by their law school to sit for the UBE prior to
graduation. The purpose of this amendment is to ensure that early
examination applicants are properly prepared for the UBE and that
the Board is not overwhelmed by too many such applicants.
The time in which an early examination applicant must submit
proof of graduation is increased to accommodate applicants who sit
for the July bar and graduate at the end of the following fall
semester.
Board’s Notes – 2018 Amendment
Rules 9(b)(1), 11, and 13(e) have been revised to ensure
consistency and clarity with regards to the permitted age of UBE
and MPRE scores. Rule 9(b)(1) is revised to make it clear that
applicants must be active attorneys to waive the five-year limitation
and that Board approval is not necessary for such a waiver. Also,
Rule 9(b)(1) now allows for an extension to the time limitation for
good cause, consistent with existing Rule 13(d) and the revisions to
Rules 11 and 13(e). See Board’s Notes to simultaneous amendments
to Rules 11 and 13.
Board’s Notes – 2017 Amendment
The revised rule, effective April 18, 2016, eliminated the option
of applying to the Board for permission, on a showing of good
cause, to sit for the exam a fifth time. The amendment to Rule
9(b)(4) reinstates the option of applying to the Board for permission
to sit for the Exam a fifth time (which was the prior practice of the
Board before the adoption of the UBE). The amendment makes
clear that the Board has the discretion to waive the four-attempt
limitation where (1) an Applicant has made a strong showing of
improved exam preparation, such that he or she is well prepared to
pass the Exam, (2) there is good cause to grant the waiver (e.g., a
previously undiagnosed learning disorder), and (3) the limitation
would not serve to protect the public. The amendment does not
allow the Board to grant permission for an Applicant to sit a sixth
time.
Board’s Notes – 2016 Amendment
An amendment of Rule 9(b)(1), effective December 5, 2016,
extends from three years to five years the time within which an
applicant must sit for the bar exam after graduating law school or
completing the LOS program.
Elements of Rule 9 are drawn from the prior rules §§ 8, 9, and
10, but much of the rule is new, and reflects the adoption of the
Uniform Bar Examination.
Consistent with the adoption of the UBE, the rule provides the
Board discretion to coordinate administration of the exam with
neighboring jurisdictions, so long as the exam is administered at a
site that is reasonably convenient to Vermont. For example, the
Board may explore jointly administering the exam with New
Hampshire at a central location.
The rule includes a new provision that an Applicant must sit for
the bar examination within three years of graduating from law
school or completing the law office study program, unless the
applicant is licensed to practice law in another jurisdiction.
Another new provision allows law students to sit for the
examination after completing five semesters of law school, which
for most students in full-time programs would be in February of the
third year. To qualify for admission under this provision, an
Applicant must graduate within six months of sitting for the exam.
Consistent with the prior rule § 10(k), Applicants may not sit for
the examination more than four times. Rule 9 (and Rule 13) apply
the same limit to UBE attempts in any jurisdiction. The new rules
eliminate the option of applying to the Board for permission, on a
showing of good cause, to sit for the exam a fifth time. The former
provision cannot be administered uniformly with respect to other
UBE jurisdictions, because the Board cannot control who sits for the
examination in those jurisdictions.
Other provisions address administrative requirements, either
reflecting current practice, such as requiring identification at the
exam, or reflecting changes associated with the UBE.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
a91650e3b621c55d8acd60bc362c27705216c1527060ae1b7756f4e920cb59ce
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.