Bindinglaw

VT · jury_instructions

Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR26-311

POSSESSION OF STOLEN PROPERTY (VALUE MORE THAN $900), 13 V.S.A. § 2561

activein force · 2013-05-29 – presentas-observed

The State has charged (Def)_______________ with possession of stolen property, as follows:

[Read the charge.]

Every crime is made up of essential elements. Before (Def)_______________ can be found guilty of the charge, the State must have proven each of the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. In this case, the essential elements are that on the date and at the place alleged,

(1) (Def)_______________ is the person who committed the crime charged;

(2) the property, (property)_______________, was stolen property;

(3) (Def)_______________ possessed the property without an intent to restore it to its owner or owners;

(4) (Def)_______________ knew that the property was stolen at the time [he] [she] possessed it; and

(5) at that time the property was worth more than $900.

The first essential element is that (Def)_______________ is the person who committed the crime charged.

The second essential element is that the property, (property)_______________, was stolen property. Stolen property is property which has been taken, without right, from someone in lawful possession, and with the intention to keep it wrongfully. The State must have proven that the property had been stolen, but the State need not prove who stole the property.

The third essential element is that (Def)_______________ possessed the property without an intent to restore it to its owner or owners. A person may possess property by either actual possession or constructive possession. The person has actual possession of something if [he] [she] knowingly has direct physical control over it. [He] [she] has constructive possession of something if [he] [she] knowingly has the power and intent to exercise dominion or control over it, either directly or through another person.

The law also recognizes that possession may be sole or joint. If one person alone has actual or constructive possession of something, then that person has sole possession. If two or more persons share actual or constructive possession of something, then those persons have joint possession.

You may find that (Def)_______________ had possession of the property if the State has proven that [he] [she] had actual or constructive possession, either alone or jointly with another. The evidence need not prove that there was actual physical possession or touching of the stolen property; it is enough if (Def)_______________ exercised control, care or dominion over the property. The State must have proven that (Def)_______________ possessed the stolen property within the State of Vermont. It does not matter where the property was stolen.

As part of the third essential element, the State also must have proven that (Def)_______________ did not intend to restore the property to its owner or owners. The intent with which a person does an act may be shown by the way in which he or she expresses it to others, or by his or her conduct. In determining (Def)_______________’s intent, you should consider all of the surrounding facts and circumstances established by the evidence.

The fourth essential element is that (Def)_______________ knew that the property was stolen at the time [he] [she] possessed it. (Def)_______________ must have actually known that the property was stolen. Actual knowledge may be proven by direct or circumstantial evidence. In determining whether (Def)_______________ actually knew that the property was stolen, you should consider all of the surrounding facts and circumstances.

The last essential element is that, at the time (Def)_______________ possessed it, the value of the property was more than $900. The value means fair market value, that is, the price that a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller. On this issue you may consider the opinion of (owner)_______________ as the owner of the property, and any other evidence of the value.

All of the elements of the offense must have been present at the same time. If the State has not proven each of the essential elements of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find (Def)_______________ not guilty. However, if the State has proven all of the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you must return a verdict of guilty.

History

Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR26-311 (05/29/13). 13 V.S.A. § 2561. Prepared by the Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions committee; published on vtjuryinstructions.org, sponsored by the Vermont Bar Association. The committee states that the instructions have not been approved by the Vermont Supreme Court.

Provenance

Source
vtjuryinstructions.org
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
c6f5dab8a612e332d8839e2f86eded64fbb451cee519a3f5bbb8cd9fab550f6a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR26-311 · binding.law