VT · jury_instructions
Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR22-506
AGGRAVATED STALKING (VIOLATES COURT ORDER) -- 13 V.S.A. § 1063(a)(1)
The State has charged (Def)_______________ with aggravated stalking, as follows:
[Read the charge.]
Every crime is made up of essential elements. Before (Def)_______________ can be found guilty of the charge, the State must have proven each of the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. In this case, the essential elements are that on the dates and at the places alleged,
(1) (Def)_______________;
(2) intentionally engaged in a course of conduct which consisted of [following] [lying in wait for] [harassing] (victim)_______________, by (specific acts)_______________;
(3) (Def)_______________ did the alleged acts without any legitimate purpose;
(4) (Def)_______________’s conduct caused (victim)_______________ [to fear for [his] [her] physical safety] [substantial emotional distress];
(5) (Def)_______________ intended to cause (victim)_______________ [to fear for [his] [her] physical safety] [substantial emotional distress]; and
(6) (Def)_______________’s conduct violated a court order, then still in effect, that prohibited stalking at the time of the conduct.
The first essential element is that (Def)_______________ is the person who committed the alleged acts.
The second essential element is that (Def)_______________ intentionally engaged in a course of conduct which consisted of [following] [lying in wait for] [harassing] (victim)_______________.
A course of conduct means a pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts over a period of time, however short, showing a continuity of purpose.
[Following means maintaining over a period of time a visual or physical closeness to another person in such manner as would cause a reasonable person to have a fear of unlawful sexual conduct, unlawful restraint, bodily injury, or death.]
[Lying in wait means hiding or being concealed for the purpose of attacking or harming another person.]
[Harassing means a course of conduct directed at a specific person which would cause a reasonable person to fear unlawful sexual conduct, unlawful restraint, bodily injury, or death, including but not limited to verbal threats, written, telephonic or other electronically communicated threats, vandalism, or unconsented to physical contact.]
Here the State alleges that (Def)_______________ intentionally engaged in a course of conduct which consisted of [following] [lying in wait for] [harassing] (victim)_______________, by (specific acts)_______________.
The third essential element is that (Def)_______________ did the alleged acts without any legitimate purpose.
The fourth essential element is that (Def)_______________’s conduct caused (victim)_______________ [to fear for [his] [her] physical safety] [substantial emotional distress].
The fifth essential element is that (Def)_______________ intended to cause (victim)_______________ [to fear for [his] [her] physical safety] [substantial emotional distress].
The State must have proven intent in two separate elements. Under the second essential element, the State must have proven that (Def)_______________ intentionally engaged in the course of conduct that is charged as stalking; and under the fifth essential element, the State must have proven that (Def)_______________ intended to cause (victim)_______________ [to fear for [his] [her] physical safety] [substantial emotional distress].
A person acts intentionally if he or she acts purposely, and not inadvertently, because of mistake, or by accident. The intent with which a person does an act may be shown by the way in which the person expresses it to others, or by his or her conduct. In determining (Def)_______________’s intent, you should consider all of the surrounding facts and circumstances established by the evidence.
The last essential element is that (Def)_______________’s conduct violated a court order, then still in effect, that prohibited stalking at the time of the conduct. The State must have proven the specific terms of the order, and that it was still in effect at the time of the alleged violation. You may not consider the facts and circumstances giving rise to the order.
If the State has not proven each of the essential elements of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find (Def)_______________ not guilty of the charge. However, if the State has proven all of the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must return a verdict of guilty.
History
Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR22-506 (03/23/07). Prepared by the Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions committee; published on vtjuryinstructions.org, sponsored by the Vermont Bar Association. The committee states that the instructions have not been approved by the Vermont Supreme Court.
Provenance
- Source
- vtjuryinstructions.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
267b044b3c7059533807573c756bdad151464ac4ddbb39a6cd4e0ff3f8c08930
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.