Bindinglaw

VT · jury_instructions

Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR22-503

STALKING -- 13 V.S.A. § 1062 (based on 2015 amendments)

activein force · 2018-07-19 – presentas-observed

The State has charged (Def)_______________ with stalking, as follows:

[Read the charge.]

Every crime is made up of essential elements. Before (Def)_______________ can be found guilty of the charge, the State must have proven each of the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. In this case, the essential elements are that on the dates and at the places alleged,

(1) (Def)_______________;

(2) intentionally engaged in a course of conduct directed at a specific person, (victim)_______________, by (specific acts)_______________;

(3) that (Def)_______________ knew or should have known would cause a reasonable person [to fear for his or her safety] [to fear for the safety of another] [substantial emotional distress].

The first essential element is that (Def)_______________ is the person who committed the alleged acts.

The second essential element is that (Def)_______________ intentionally engaged in a course of conduct directed at a specific person, (victim)_______________. A person acts intentionally if he or she acts purposely, and not inadvertently, because of mistake, or by accident. The intent with which a person does an act may be shown by the way in which the person expresses it to others, or by his or her conduct. In determining (Def)_______________’s intent, you should consider all of the surrounding facts and circumstances established by the evidence. A course of conduct means two or more acts over a period of time, however short, in which a person follows, monitors, surveils, threatens, or makes threats about another person, or interferes with another person’s property. This includes acts conducted by the person directly or indirectly, and by any action, method, device, or means. [Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of “course of conduct.”] Here the State alleges that (Def)_______________ intentionally engaged in a course of conduct directed at a specific person, (victim)_______________, by (specific acts)_______________; [In the event that ___________ (Defendant) is charged with engaging in stalking by threats or threatening, the state need not prove that there was an express or overt threat].

The last essential element is that (Def)_______________ knew or should have known that [his] [her] conduct would cause a reasonable person [to fear for his or her safety] [to fear for the safety of another] [substantial emotional distress]. Reasonable person means a reasonable person in (victim’s)__________’s circumstances. [Emotional distress means significant mental suffering or distress that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling.]

If the State has not proven each of the essential elements of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find (Def)_______________ not guilty of the charge. However, if the State has proven all of the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must return a verdict of guilty.

[See Reporter’s Notes for detailed description of the 2015 statutory amendments, the evolution of the stalking statutes and instructions, and applicable opinions of the Supreme Court.]

History

Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR22-503 (7/19/18). 13 V.S.A. § 1062. Prepared by the Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions committee; published on vtjuryinstructions.org, sponsored by the Vermont Bar Association. The committee states that the instructions have not been approved by the Vermont Supreme Court.

Provenance

Source
vtjuryinstructions.org
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
2f4faa1e563e6aad5289409009497ab034d18d5b1228fa077a9b73d3cc5ee824
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.