VT · jury_instructions
Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR22-096
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, WITH INTENT TO PREVENT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FROM PERFORMING LAWFUL DUTY -- 13 V.S.A. § 1024(a)(4) and § 1028
The State has charged (Def)_______________ with aggravated assault, as follows:
[Read the charge.]
Every crime is made up of essential elements. Before (Def)_______________ can be found guilty of the charge, the State must have proven each of the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. In this case, the essential elements are that on the date and at the place alleged,
(1) (Def)_______________;
(2) caused physical injury to (victim)_______________, by (specific acts)_______________; and
(3) [he] [she] did so with the intent to prevent a law enforcement officer from performing a lawful duty.
The first essential element is that (Def)_______________ is the person who committed the alleged acts.
The second essential element is that (Def)_______________ caused physical injury to (victim)_______________. The state must have proven that (Def)_______________’s acts directly and without interruption caused (victim)_______________ physical pain, illness, or any impairment of [his] [her] physical condition. The State alleges that (Def)_______________ caused physical injury to (victim)_______________, by (specific acts)_______________.
The last essential element is that (Def)_______________ acted with the intent to prevent a law enforcement officer from performing a lawful duty. A person acts intentionally if he or she acts purposely, and not inadvertently, because of mistake, or by accident. You may find that (Def)_______________ acted intentionally if it was his conscious objective to prevent a law enforcement officer from performing a lawful duty. In determining (Def)_______________’s intent, you should consider all of the surrounding facts and circumstances established by the evidence.
The term law enforcement officer means any state police officer, sheriff, deputy sheriff, special deputy sheriff, municipal police officer, constable, game warden, or other person authorized to make an arrest. The State must have proven that (Def)_______________ acted with intent to prevent a law enforcement officer from performing a lawful duty. The lawfulness of an officer’s actions is defined by the scope of the officer’s duty and authority. A law enforcement officer was not performing a lawful duty if [he] [she] was pursuing [his] [her] own interests.
All of the elements of the offense must have been present at the same time. If the State has not proven each of the essential elements of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find (Def)_______________ not guilty. However, if the State has proven all of the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you must return a verdict of guilty.
History
Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR22-096 (03/23/07). 13 V.S.A. § 1024(a)(4). Prepared by the Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions committee; published on vtjuryinstructions.org, sponsored by the Vermont Bar Association. The committee states that the instructions have not been approved by the Vermont Supreme Court.
Provenance
- Source
- vtjuryinstructions.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
d73236bd188fef4aed6a3a2f7320cd26d8b759f11d06e2aa469f8615de6fedd9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.