VT · jury_instructions
Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR05-102
TESTIMONY OF ACCOMPLICES
You have also heard witnesses who testified that they were accomplices, that is, they said they participated with (Def)_______________ in committing a crime. You should examine the testimony of accomplices with greater care than the testimony of a witness who did not claim to have participated in the commission of that crime. The reason is that when an accomplice testifies, he or she has usually made an agreement with the government that, in exchange for the testimony, he or she will not be punished for committing a crime, or will receive a lighter sentence. A witness who has made such an agreement has a motive to testify falsely.
You must therefore evaluate the testimony of [an accomplice] [(accomplice)_______________] with great care. Consider whether the testimony of the accomplice has been affected by self-interest, or by an agreement he or she may have with the government, or by his or her own interest in the outcome of this case, or by any prejudice he or she may have against (Def)_______________. Whether to believe the testimony of accomplices, and how much weight to give it, is up to you.
History
Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR05-102 (05/10/04). Prepared by the Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions committee; published on vtjuryinstructions.org, sponsored by the Vermont Bar Association. The committee states that the instructions have not been approved by the Vermont Supreme Court.
Provenance
- Source
- vtjuryinstructions.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
8eb7f61e84995bcc3c19e755510a337227355d6f32608825405b0af6adf0914a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.