Bindinglaw

VT · jury_instructions

Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR05-081

HEARSAY OF CHILD (V.R.E. 804a)

activein force · 2003-07-28 – presentas-observed

In this case, you have heard (adult witness or witnesses)_______________ testify that (child)_______________ made certain statements outside of court.

In evaluating these statements, you should weigh the credibility of the adult witness under the instructions I have given, and you should also weigh the child’s testimony as I have instructed. The weight you give to the statements depends on whether you find from the time, content and circumstances under which the child’s statements were made that they were trustworthy or untrustworthy. To decide this, you may consider (1) whether the statements were made spontaneously, or, if questioning occurred, the manner in which the questioning took place; (2) whether the child’s statements make sense; (3) whether the statements were detailed; and (4) what were the emotions displayed at the time the child made the statements. You may also consider the child’s age, intelligence, [his] [her] memory, and [his] [her] ability to tell the truth.

History

Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions CR05-081 (07/28/03). Prepared by the Vermont Model Criminal Jury Instructions committee; published on vtjuryinstructions.org, sponsored by the Vermont Bar Association. The committee states that the instructions have not been approved by the Vermont Supreme Court.

Provenance

Source
vtjuryinstructions.org
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
c684bbd2b83c39ac4838fb776c207801feb2a298bb88b14b35f97c4812fff98f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.