Bindinglaw

VA · rules

Va. R. Evid. 2:605

Competency of Court Personnel as Witnesses

activein force · 2021-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) No judge is competent to testify in any criminal or civil proceeding as to any matter

which came before the judge in the course of official duties.

(b) Except as otherwis e provided in this Rule, n o clerk of any court, magistrate, or other

person having the power to issue warrants, is competent to testify in any criminal or civil

proceeding, as to any matter which came before him or her in the course of official dutie s. Such

person may be competent to testify in any criminal proceeding wherein the defendant is charged

with perjury or pursuant to the provisions of § 18.2-460 or in any proceeding authorized pursuant

to § 19.2-353.3. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any judge, clerk of any

court, magistrate, or other person having the power to is sue warrants, who is the victim of a

crime, is not incompetent solely because of his or her office to testify in any criminal or civil

proceeding arising out of the crime. Nothing in this subpart (b) preclude s otherwise proper

testimony by a clerk or deputy clerk concerning documents filed in the official records.

History

Derivation: (derived from Code § 19.2-271) Adopted and promulgated by Order dated June 1, 2012; effective July 1, 2012. Last amended by Order dated November 13, 2020; effective July 1, 2021.

Provenance

Source
www.vacourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
81ed039c8711fef482b2a631b84d00054c90a8a8946584a6438a769489648017
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Va. R. Evid. 2:605 — Competency of Court Personnel as… · binding.law