VA · rules
Va. R. Evid. 2:412
Admissibility of Complaining Witness' Prior Sexual Conduct; Criminal Sexual Assault Cases; Relevance of Past Behavior
(a) In prosecutions under Article 7, Chapter 4 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, under
clause (iii) or (iv) of § 18.2-48, or under §§ 18.2-370, 18.2-370.01, or 18.2-370.1, general
reputation or opinion evidence of the complaining witness' unchaste character or prior sexual
conduct must not be admitted. Unless the complaining witness voluntarily agrees otherwise,
evidence of specific instances of his or her pr ior sexual conduct may be admitted only if it is
relevant and is:
1. Evidence offered to provide an alternative expla nation for physical evidence of the
offense charged which is introduced by the prosecution, limited to evidence designed to
explain the pre sence of semen, pregnancy, disease, or physical injury to the complaining
witness' intimate parts; or
2. Evidence of sexual conduct between the complaining witness and the accused offered to
support a contention that the alleged offense was not accomplishe d by force, threat or
intimidation or through the use of the complaining witness' mental incapacity or physical
helplessness, provided that the sexual conduct occurred within a period of time reasonably
proximate to the offense charged under the circumstan ces of this case; or
3. Evidence offered to rebut evidence of the complaining witness' prior sexual conduct
introduce d by the prosecution.
(b) Nothing contained in this Rule prohibits the accused from presenting evidence relevant to
show that the complaini ng witness had a motive to fabricate the charge against the accused. If
such evidence relates to the past sexual conduct of the complaining witness with a person other
than the accused, it may not be admitted and may not be referred to at any preliminary hearing or
trial unless the party offering same files a written notice generally describing the evidence prior
to the introduction of any evidence, or the opening statement of either counsel, whichever first
occurs, at the preliminary hearing or trial at which the admission of the evidence may be sought.
(c) Evidence described in subdivisions (a) and (b) of this Ru le may not be admitted and may
not be referred to at any preliminary hearing or trial until the court first determines the
admissibility of that e vidence at an evidentiary hearing to be held before the evidence is
introduced at such preliminary hearing o r trial. The court must exclude from the evidentiary
hearing all persons except the accused, the complaining witness, other necessary witnesses, and
required court personnel. If the court determines that the evidence meets the requirements of
subdivisions (a) and (b) of this Rule, is admissible before the judge or jury trying the case in the
ordinary course of the preliminary hearing or trial. If the court initially determines that the
evidence is inadmissible, but new information is discovered du ring the course of the preliminary
hearing or trial which may make such evidence admissible, the court must determine in an
evidentiary hearing wheth er such evidence is admissible.
History
Derivation: (derived from Code § 18.2-67.7) Adopted and promulgated by Order dated June 1, 2012; effective July 1, 2012. Last amended by Order dated November 13, 2020; effective July 1, 2021.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
ede0ed4a84157ce2bb275745f41146afb9b3db141f81631768d6fdb3e1541ae8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.