VA · rules
Va. Sup. Ct. R. 10
Provision of Legal Services Following Determination of Major Disaster
(a) Determination of existence of major disaster. -- Solely for purposes of this Rule,
the Chief Justice of this Court may determine when, as a result of a major disaster, an
emergency affecting the justice system has occurred in:
(1) this jurisdiction and, if so, whether that emergency affects the entirety or
only a part of this jurisdiction, or
(2) another jurisdiction, but only if such a determination and its geographical
scope have previously been made by the highest court of that jurisdiction.
(b) Temporary practice in this jurisdiction following major disaster. -- Following a
determination, pursuant to paragraph (a) of this Rule, of an emergency affecting the justice
system in this jurisdiction that warrants the assistance of lawyers from outside this
jurisdiction, or a determination by the Chief Justice that persons displaced by a major
disaster in another jurisdiction and residing in this jurisdiction are in need of pro bono
services and the assistance of lawyers from outside of this jurisdiction is warranted to help
provide such assistance, a Foreign Lawyer may provide pro bono legal services in this
jurisdiction on a temporary basis. Those legal services must be assigned and supervised
through an established bar association pro bono program, not-for-profit bar association, an
approved legal assistance organization, a public defender’s office, or through any
organization(s) specifically designated by the Chief Justice.
(c) Temporary practice in this jurisdiction following major disaster in another
jurisdiction. -- Following the determination of a major disaster pursuant to (a)(2), a Foreign
Lawyer who is authorized to practice law and who principally practices in the geographic
area of the other jurisdiction determined to be affected may provide legal services in this
jurisdiction on a temporary basis. Those legal services must arise out of and be reasonably
related to that lawyer’s practice of law in the jurisdiction, or geographic area of that
jurisdiction, where the major disaster occurred.
(d) Duration of authority for temporary practice. -- The authority to practice law in
this jurisdiction granted by paragraphs (b) and (c) of this Rule will end when the Chief
Justice determines that the conditions caused by the major disaster in this or another affected
jurisdiction have ended, except that a lawyer then representing clients in this jurisdiction
pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) is authorized to continue the provision of legal services for
such time as is reasonably necessary to complete the representation. However, the lawyer
may not accept new clients or new unrelated matters for an existing client after the Chief
Justice has determined that the conditions caused by the major disaster have ended.
(e) Court appearances. -- The authority granted by this Rule does not include
appearances in court except:
(1) pursuant to a court's pro hac vice admission rule; or
(2) if the Chief Justice, in any determination made under paragraph (a), grants
blanket permission to appear in all or designated courts of this jurisdiction to lawyers
providing legal services pursuant to paragraph (b).
When authority to appear in any court is granted under either paragraph (e)(1)
or (e)(2), any pro hac vice admission fees waived.
(f) Disciplinary authority and registration requirement. -- Lawyers providing legal
services in this jurisdiction pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) are subject to this Court’s
disciplinary authority and the Rules of Professional Conduct of this jurisdiction as provided
in Rule 8.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Lawyers providing legal services in this
jurisdiction under paragraphs (b) or (c) must, within 30 days from the commencement of the
provision of legal services, file a registration statement with the Clerk of this Court. The
registration statement must be in a form prescribed by this Court. Any lawyer who provides
legal services pursuant to this Rule is not considered to be engaged in the unlawful practice
of law in this jurisdiction.
(g) Notification to clients. -- Foreign Lawyers who provide legal services pursuant to
this Rule must inform clients in this jurisdiction of the jurisdiction in which they are
authorized to practice law, any limitations of that authorization, and that they are not
authorized to practice law in this jurisdiction except as permitted by this Rule. They must
not state or imply to any person that they are otherwise authorized to practice law in this
jurisdiction.
(h) Definitions. -- For purposes of this rule:
(1) “Foreign Lawyer” is a person with an active and unrestricted license to
practice law issued by the bar or highest court of any State or Territory of the United
States or the District of Columbia, but neither licensed by the Supreme Court of
Virginia or authorized under its rules to practice law generally in the Commonwealth
of Virginia, nor disbarred or suspended from practice.
(2) “Pro bono” means that legal services are provided without compensation,
expectation of compensation, or other direct or indirect pecuniary gain to the lawyer.
Comment
[1] A major disaster, including, for example, a hurricane, earthquake, flood, wildfire,
tornado, public health emergency, or an event caused by terrorists or acts of war, in this or
another jurisdiction may cause an emergency affecting the justice system with respect to the
provision of legal services. This emergency may continue for a sustained period of time,
interfering with the ability of lawyers admitted and practicing in the affected jurisdiction to
continue to represent clients until the disaster has ended. When this happens, lawyers from
the affected jurisdiction may need to provide legal services to their clients, on a temporary
basis, from an office outside their home jurisdiction. In addition, lawyers in an unaffected
jurisdiction may be willing to serve residents of the affected jurisdiction who have unmet
legal needs as a result of the disaster or whose legal needs temporarily are unmet because of
disruption to the practices of local lawyers. Lawyers from unaffected jurisdictions may offer
to provide these legal services either by traveling to the affected jurisdiction or from their
own offices or both, provided the legal services are provided on a pro bono basis through
entities authorized by this Rule.
[2] Under paragraph (a)(1), the Chief Justice may determine whether a major disaster
causing an emergency affecting the justice system has occurred in this jurisdiction, or in a
part of this jurisdiction, for purposes of triggering paragraph (b) of this Rule. The Chief
Justice may, for example, determine that the entirety of this jurisdiction has suffered a
disruption in the provision of legal services or that only certain areas have suffered such an
event.
[3] Restrictions on a lawyer’s license to practice law that would prohibit that lawyer
from providing legal services pursuant to this Rule include, but are not limited to, probation,
inactive status, disability status, or a non-disciplinary administrative suspension for failure
to complete continuing legal education or other requirements. Public protection warrants
exclusion of these lawyers from the authority to provide legal services as defined in this
Rule. Foreign Lawyers may also be authorized to provide legal services in this jurisdiction
on a temporary basis pursuant to Part 6 § I (C) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of
Virginia and Rule 5.5(d)(4)of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
[4] Under paragraph (c), the phrase “arise out of and reasonably related to” requires that
the services arise out of or be reasonably related to the Foreign Lawyer’s practice in a
jurisdiction in which the Foreign Lawyer is admitted to practice. A variety of factors
evidence such a relationship. The Foreign Lawyer’s client may have been previously
represented by the Foreign Lawyer, or may be resident in or have substantial contacts with
the jurisdiction in which the Foreign Lawyer is admitted. The matter, although involving
other jurisdictions, may have a significant connection with that jurisdiction. In other cases,
significant aspects of the Foreign Lawyer’s work might be conducted in that jurisdiction or a
significant aspect of the matter may involve the law of that jurisdiction. The necessary
relationship might arise when the client’s activities or the legal issues involve multiple
jurisdictions, such as when the officers of a multinational corporation survey potential
business sites and seek the services of their Foreign Lawyer in assessing the relative merits
of each. In addition, the services may draw on the Foreign Lawyer’s recognized expertise
developed through the regular practice of law on behalf of clients in matters involving a
particular body of federal, nationally-uniform, foreign, or international law.
[5-7] ABA Model Rule comments not adopted.
History
Promulgated by Order dated October 30, 2015; effective January 1, 2016. Last amended by Order dated November 23, 2020; effective March 1, 2021.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
b5141642d474a8768104de73ebe0fbd9c3330998e4e74a04680492639f110ec8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.