VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 7.300
Burning Realty With Malice or Intent to Defraud—Person Therein
The defendant is charged with the crime of arson. The Commonwealth must prove beyond a
reasonable doubt each of the following elements of that crime:
(1) That the defendant [burned; by use of an explosive device or substance destroyed, in whole or in
part; caused to be burned or destroyed; aided, counseled or procured the burning or destruction of] a [;
bridge; lock; dam; (identify building or structure of a type different from those addressed in other
provisions set out in Chapter 5 of Article 1 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia)]; and
(2) That the defendant acted with [malice; intent to defraud (an insurance company; name other
person)]; and
(3) That at the time there was a person [therein; thereon].
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of the crime, then you shall find the defendant guilty of arson of an
occupied structure [but you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and
further evidence has been heard by you].
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
the first two elements of the crime but has not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a
person therein at the time the crime was committed; and, if you further find from the evidence
beyond a reasonable doubt that the value of the [bridge; lock; dam; (identify building or structure of
a type different from those addressed in other provisions set out in Chapter 5 of Article 1 of Title 18.2
of the Code of Virginia)] with the property therein was $1,000 or more, then you shall find the
defendant guilty of arson of an unoccupied structure [but you shall not fix the punishment until
your verdict has been returned and further evidence has been heard by you].
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
the first two elements of the crime but has not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a
person therein at the time the crime was committed and that the value of the [bridge; lock; dam;
(identify building or structure of a type different from those addressed in other provisions set out in
Chapter 5 of Article 1 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia)] with the property therein was $1,000 or
more; and, if you further find from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the [bridge; lock;
dam; (identify building or structure of a type different from those addressed in other provisions set out in
Chapter 5 of Article 1 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia)] with the property therein was of some
value (there need be no proof of a minimum or specific value), you shall find the defendant guilty
of the misdemeanor of arson of an unoccupied structure [but you shall not fix the punishment until
your verdict has been returned and further evidence has been heard by you].
If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt either of the
first two elements of the crime or that the [bridge; lock; dam; (identify building or structure of a type
different from those addressed in other provisions set out in Chapter 5 of Article 1 of Title 18.2 of the
Code of Virginia)] with the property therein was of some value, then you shall find the defendant
not guilty.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- crim-2025-10-01
- Content hash
9b6fda3a89c29ab87f36cd888a177e5cb3140c2eb5084653aded68676d932f1b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.