VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 6.400
Maintaining Common Nuisance—Manufacture, Storage, Sale, Dispensing, Giving Away, or Use of Alcoholic Beverages
The defendant is charged with the crime of [maintaining; aiding; abetting; knowingly associating
with others in maintaining] a common nuisance. The Commonwealth must prove beyond a
reasonable doubt each of the following elements of that crime:
(1) That alcoholic beverages were habitually [manufactured; stored; sold; dispensed; given away;
used] [at a house; boathouse; building; club or fraternity or lodge room; boat; car; other place] in a
manner contrary to law; and
(2) That the defendant [maintained; aided; abetted; knowingly associated with others in maintaining]
such [place].
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant guilty, [but
you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and further evidence has
been heard by you].
If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt either or
both of the elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant not guilty.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- crim-2025-10-01
- Content hash
a85a73e160e773992a2a528b48224beb52039ccafddeae2195b6a84f476899a5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.