Bindinglaw

VA · jury_instructions

Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 45.300

Disregarding Signal by Law Enforcement Officer to Stop

activein force · 2025-10-01 – presentcompiled-edition

The defendant is charged with the crime of disregarding a signal by law-enforcement officer to

stop. The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of

the crime:

(1) That the defendant received a visible or audible signal from law-enforcement officer to bring

his motor vehicle to a stop; and

(2) That the defendant drove such motor vehicle in a willful and wanton disregard of such signal so

as to interfere with or endanger the operation of the law-enforcement vehicle or endanger a

person.

If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt

each of the above elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant guilty [but

you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and further evidence has

been heard by you].

If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt either of the

elements of the crime, then you shall find the defendant not guilty.

History

Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.

Provenance

Source
vacourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-11
Edition
crim-2025-10-01
Content hash
a7a2abcf677e4e3879da219d32adac6b436eea320a31a097458f90226714820b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.