VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 43.400
Tampering with Device Designed to Receive Money
The defendant is charged with the crime of tampering with a device designed to receive money.
The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of that
crime:
(1) That the defendant [entered; forced an entrance into; attempted to force an entrance into; tampered
with; inserted any part of an instrument into] a [parking meter; vending machine; pay telephone; money
changing machine; device designed to receive money]; and
(2) That the defendant intended to steal from this device.
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant guilty [but
you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and further evidence has
been heard by you].
If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt either or
both elements of the crime, then you shall find the defendant not guilty.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- crim-2025-10-01
- Content hash
93bf0de0126fe809217feaf0734a553c408997c8d1992946f1086a667482122e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.