VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 36.900
Tampering With Metering Device
The defendant is charged with the crime of tampering with a metering device which is part of a
facility used to provide [oil; telephone; telegraph; electric; gas; water; sewer; wastewater] service to
the public. The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following
elements of that crime:
(1) That the defendant tampered with a metering device which was part of a facility used to
provide [oil; telephone; telegraph; electric; gas; water; sewer; wastewater] service to the public; and
(2) That he did so with the intent to prevent the meter from properly registering the amount used;
and
(3) That the defendant did the act without the authorization of the owner of the metering device.
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant guilty [but
you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and further evidence has
been heard by you].
If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any one or
more of the elements of the crime, then you shall find the defendant not guilty.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- crim-2025-10-01
- Content hash
e6255aea92b1a6ec5fefebd2a06b3445e50939df999595f001fdf7ebf59aeaa2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.