Bindinglaw

VA · jury_instructions

Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 36.420

Receiving Stolen Goods—Supplemental Instructions

activein force · 2025-10-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Knowledge that the goods were stolen need not be directly proved. It may be shown by

circumstances which, if proved, must have caused the defendant to believe the goods were stolen.

Evidence that the property was obtained at less than true value, standing alone, is not sufficient

to show that the defendant knew the goods were stolen.

If you believe from the evidence that the (describe goods) were previously stolen from (name

person) by some other person, then proof of the exclusive possession by the defendant of the

recently stolen (describe goods) is a circumstance from which you may reasonably infer that the

defendant received the (describe goods) knowing them to have been stolen and that he received

them with dishonest intent, unless, from all of the evidence, you have a reasonable doubt as to

whether the defendant received the (describe goods) knowing them to be stolen or whether he

received them with dishonest intent.

History

Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.

Provenance

Source
vacourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-11
Edition
crim-2025-10-01
Content hash
870c06e44feda44c4c7f6ba6f0ba03768db6326e5cc8cff0700f094369b133c3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.