VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 35.900
Giving False Identity to Law Enforcement Officer
The defendant is charged with the crime of falsely identifying himself to a law enforcement
officer. The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements
of that crime:
(1) That a law enforcement officer lawfully detained the defendant; and
(2) That the law enforcement officer requested the defendant to identify himself; and
(3) That the defendant falsely identified himself to the law enforcement officer; and
(4) That the defendant intended to deceive the law enforcement officer as to his real identity.
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant guilty, [but
you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and further evidence has
been heard by you].
If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any one or
more of the elements of the crime, then you shall find the defendant not guilty.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- crim-2025-10-01
- Content hash
dc693fdc548f9c4e90a829a589da524e2f88666aadb2ff908be0d901f0a8e7e4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.