Bindinglaw

VA · jury_instructions

Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 33.670

Involuntary Manslaughter, Fentanyl

activein force · 2025-10-01 – presentcompiled-edition

The defendant is charged with the crime of involuntary manslaughter. The Commonwealth

must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of that crime:

(1) That the defendant unintentionally killed (name of person); and

(2) That the defendant [manufactured] [sold, not as an accommodation for another; distributed, not as

an accommodation for another] a controlled substance that contained a detectable amount of

fentanyl; and

(3) That the controlled substance was the proximate cause of the death of (name of person).

If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt

each of the above elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant guilty [but

you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and further evidence has been heard

by you].

If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any one or

more of the elements of the crime, then you shall find the defendant not guilty.

History

Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.

Provenance

Source
vacourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-11
Edition
crim-2025-10-01
Content hash
b2a30b574c30f46ca7be68343a9b230615785665a05d32e7f1776a48c5e1bc8a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.