VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 10.400(b)
Unlawful Paramilitary Activity—Assembling for Training, Practice, or Instruction
The defendant is charged with the crime of unlawful paramilitary activity. The Commonwealth
must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of that crime:
(1) That the defendant assembled with one or more persons for the purpose of [training with;
practicing with; being instructed in the use of] any [firearm; explosive or incendiary device; technique
capable of causing injury or death to persons]; and
(2) That he did so with the intent to employ such training [for use in; in furtherance of] a civil
disorder.
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant guilty [but
you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and further evidence has
been heard by you].
If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt either or
both of the elements of the crime, then you shall find the defendant not guilty.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- crim-2025-10-01
- Content hash
ee265a258de853e3d866a76d0f3da0f96cd69cdee0d7cb5e22103c92f105c917
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.