VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Crim. No. 10.220
Burning of Object With Intent to Intimidate—Highway or Public Place
The defendant is charged with the crime of burning an object [on a highway; in a public place]
with the intent to intimidate any person or group of persons. The Commonwealth must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of that crime:
(1) That the defendant burned an object; and
(2) That he did so [on a highway; in a public place]; and
(3) That he did so with the intent to intimidate any person or group of persons; and
(4) That the burning was done in a manner having a direct tendency to place another person in
reasonable fear or apprehension of death or bodily injury.
If you find from the evidence that the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt
each of the above elements of the crime as charged, then you shall find the defendant guilty [but
you shall not fix the punishment until your verdict has been returned and further evidence has
been heard by you].
If you find that the Commonwealth has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any one or
more of the elements of the crime, then you shall find the defendant not guilty.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Criminal, Release 26, October 2025. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- crim-2025-10-01
- Content hash
b2f2d1d4e4613937b321aa24b51b07cc2dae647bfabd72c9055ce58735e3fded
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.