Bindinglaw

VA · jury_instructions

Va. Model Jury Instr. Civ. No. 7.010

Negligent Entrustment

activein force · 2026-04-01 – presentcompiled-edition

The plaintiff contends that the defendant is liable because he permitted his vehicle to be used

by an unfit driver whose negligence, as a result of the unfitness, caused the accident. An unfit

driver is a person who, because of his [age; inexperience; physical condition; mental condition;

drug/alcohol impairment], is likely to use a motor vehicle in a manner involving unreasonable risk of

harm to others. Plaintiff must prove by the greater weight of the evidence that:

(1) defendant expressly or impliedly permitted (name of driver) to drive his vehicle; and

(2) (name of driver) was an unfit driver; and

(3) defendant knew, or should have known, that (name of driver) was an unfit driver; and

(4) (name of driver) was negligent as a result of the unfitness; and

(5) (name of driver)’s negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries.

Permission is express when it is given directly. Permission is implied when it is gathered from

the circumstances, general language, or conduct of the parties.

History

Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Civil, Release 26, April 2026. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.

Provenance

Source
vacourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-11
Edition
civ-2026-04-01
Content hash
8298d69781d32c4109b0ddee40a5574c3be41fc2cc253f37a5059f5eaf79e33a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.