VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Civ. No. 40.250
Wrongful or Tortious Interference With Contract Expectancy (Contract Terminable at Will); Prospective Business Relationship, or Economic Advantage; Contract: Finding Instruction
You shall find your verdict for the plaintiff if he proved by the greater weight of the evidence:
(1) that there was a [contract expectancy; prospective business relationship; economic advantage;
contract] between the plaintiff and (name of third party); and
(2) that the defendant knew of this [contract expectancy; prospective business relationship; economic
advantage; contract]; and
(3) that the defendant used improper methods to interfere with the [contract expectancy;
prospective business relationship; economic advantage; contract]; and
(4) that the defendant intended to interfere with the [contract expectancy; prospective business
relationship; economic advantage; contract]; and
(5) that it was reasonably certain that [the business relationship would have continued; the
expectancy would have been realized; the economic advantage would have been realized; the contract
would have continued] in the absence of the defendant’s conduct; and
(6) that the plaintiff was damaged by the disruption of the [contract expectancy; prospective business
relationship; economic advantage; contract].
You shall find your verdict for the defendant if the plaintiff failed to prove any one or more of
these elements; or if you find that the defendant proved by the greater weight of the evidence
that the interference was justified, privileged or not improper.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Civil, Release 26, April 2026. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- civ-2026-04-01
- Content hash
c1057d1f458759fc5014cdeaf276502f3359e607d3e82764af83278e8881430a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.