VA · jury_instructions
Va. Model Jury Instr. Civ. No. 37.050
Privilege
Under certain circumstances, a person has a limited privilege to make a defamatory statement
about another without being liable for damages.
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s statement was privileged because he has
an interest or duty in the subject, and he made the statement to another person with similar
interest or duty. The defendant’s statement is not protected, however, if he abused the privilege.
The privilege is abused when the plaintiff proves by clear and convincing evidence that:
(1) the defendant knew the statement was false or made it so recklessly as to amount to a willful
disregard for the truth, that is, with a high degree of awareness that the statement was probably
false; or
(2) the statement was deliberately made in such a way that it was heard by persons having no
interest or duty in the subject of the statement; or
(3) the statement was unnecessarily insulting; or
(4) the language used was stronger or more violent than was necessary under the circumstances;
or
(5) the statement was made because of personal spite, hatred, ill will, or desire to hurt the
plaintiff, independent of the occasion on which the communication was made.
History
Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Civil, Release 26, April 2026. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Provenance
- Source
- vacourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11
- Edition
- civ-2026-04-01
- Content hash
335bdc66a8ca69e41c1c95bf950a0ba49105a30e84d57d20b3eff2a48cd57d19
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.