Bindinglaw

VA · jury_instructions

Va. Model Jury Instr. Civ. No. 37.050

Privilege

activein force · 2026-04-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Under certain circumstances, a person has a limited privilege to make a defamatory statement

about another without being liable for damages.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s statement was privileged because he has

an interest or duty in the subject, and he made the statement to another person with similar

interest or duty. The defendant’s statement is not protected, however, if he abused the privilege.

The privilege is abused when the plaintiff proves by clear and convincing evidence that:

(1) the defendant knew the statement was false or made it so recklessly as to amount to a willful

disregard for the truth, that is, with a high degree of awareness that the statement was probably

false; or

(2) the statement was deliberately made in such a way that it was heard by persons having no

interest or duty in the subject of the statement; or

(3) the statement was unnecessarily insulting; or

(4) the language used was stronger or more violent than was necessary under the circumstances;

or

(5) the statement was made because of personal spite, hatred, ill will, or desire to hurt the

plaintiff, independent of the occasion on which the communication was made.

History

Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Civil, Release 26, April 2026. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.

Provenance

Source
vacourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-11
Edition
civ-2026-04-01
Content hash
335bdc66a8ca69e41c1c95bf950a0ba49105a30e84d57d20b3eff2a48cd57d19
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.