Bindinglaw

VA · jury_instructions

Va. Model Jury Instr. Civ. No. 35.010

Statewide or Local Standard of Care for Health Care Providers

activein force · 2026-04-01 – presentcompiled-edition

A doctor has a duty to use the degree of skill and diligence in the care and treatment of his

patient that a reasonably prudent doctor in the same field of practice or specialty in Virginia would

have used under the circumstances of this case. This is referred to as the standard of care.

[However, if you find that the [doctor; patient] has proved by the greater weight of the evidence that

the health care services, health care facilities, and customary practices in the locality where the

treatment took place make a local standard of care more appropriate than a statewide standard, then the

local standard applies and a doctor has a duty to use the degree of skill and diligence in the care and

treatment of his patient that a reasonably prudent doctor in the same field of practice or specialty in [the

same; a similar] locality would have used under the circumstances of this case.]

If a doctor fails to perform this duty [under the standard of care you find applicable], then he is

negligent.

History

Virginia Model Jury Instructions – Civil, Release 26, April 2026. The unannotated set, posted by the Supreme Court of Virginia at vacourts.gov; the book states that it is made available with the permission of the publisher, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.

Provenance

Source
vacourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-10-11
Edition
civ-2026-04-01
Content hash
25e202d8123ac62d33a62c0ff2ae43e408e0e48cdb477cbf0573e8f92514ecfa
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.