Bindinglaw

UT · rules

Utah R. Bus. & Chancery Ct. P. 42

Consolidation and separate trials

activein force · 2024-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Consolidation. When actions involving a common question of law or fact or arising from the same transaction or occurrence are pending before the court, the court may, on motion of any party or on the court’s own initiative: order that the actions are consolidated in whole or in part for any purpose, including for discovery, other pretrial matters, or a joint hearing or trial; stay any or all of the proceedings in any action subject to the order; or make other such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.

(1) In determining whether to order consolidation, the court may consider, among other factors: the complexity of the actions; the importance of any common question of fact or law to the determination of the actions; the risk of duplicative or inconsistent rulings, orders, or judgments; the relative procedural postures of the actions; the risk that consolidation may unreasonably delay the progress, increase the expense, or complicate the processing of any action; prejudice to any party that far outweighs the overall benefits of consolidation; the convenience of the parties, witnesses, and counsel; and the efficient utilization of judicial resources and court facilities and personnel.

(2) Any party may file or oppose a motion to consolidate. The motion must be filed in the first-filed action and must be served on all parties in each action pursuant to Rule 5 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. The party seeking consolidation must also file a notice of the motion in each action. The movant must, and any party may, file in each action notice of the order denying or granting the motion.

(3) If the court orders consolidation, a new case number will be used for all subsequent filings in the consolidated case. The court may direct that specified parties pay the expenses, if any, of consolidation.

(b) Separate trials. The court in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice may order a separate trial of any claim, cross claim, counterclaim, or third party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross claims, counterclaims, third party claims, or issues.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
7f60801f9fc3acda7bc359197659fdabdc351c3fe6268c129664214ed091a4ad
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Utah R. Bus. & Chancery Ct. P. 42 — Consolidation and… · binding.law