Bindinglaw

UT · rules

Utah Sup. Ct. R. Prof'l Prac. 1-585

Presumptive sanctions for violating duties owed to the legal system

activein force · 2022-11-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) False statements, fraud, and misrepresentation. The following sanctions are generally appropriate when a Lawyer’s conduct is prejudicial to the administration of justice or involves dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation to a court in violation of Rules 1.2(d), 3.3, or 4.1:

(1) Delicensure is generally appropriate when a Lawyer, with the intent to deceive the court, makes a false statement, submits a false document, or improperly withholds material information, and causes serious or potentially serious injury to a party, or causes a significant or potentially significant adverse effect on the legal proceeding.

(2) Suspension is generally appropriate when a Lawyer learns that false statements or documents have been submitted or material information improperly withheld, and takes no remedial action, and thereby causes injury or potential injury to a party to the legal proceeding, or causes an adverse or potentially adverse effect on the legal proceeding.

(3) Reprimand is generally appropriate when a Lawyer is negligent either in determining whether statements or documents are false or in taking remedial action when material information is being withheld and causes injury or potential injury to a party to the legal proceeding, or causes an adverse or potentially adverse effect on the legal proceeding.

(4) Admonition is generally appropriate when a Lawyer engages in an isolated instance of neglect in determining whether submitted statements or documents are false or in failing to disclose material information upon learning of its falsity, and causes little or no actual or potential injury to a party, or causes little or no adverse or potentially adverse effect on the legal proceeding.

(b) Abuse of the legal process. The following sanctions are generally appropriate when a Lawyer violates Rules 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.6, 3.9, 4.4, 8.4(e), or 8.4(f):

(1) Delicensure is generally appropriate when a Lawyer engages in a pattern or practice of knowingly abusing the legal process with the intent to obtain a benefit for the Lawyer or another and causes serious or potentially serious injury to a party, or causes serious or potentially serious interference with a legal proceeding.

(2) Suspension or reprimand is generally appropriate when a Lawyer knowingly or negligently abuses the legal process and causes injury or potential injury to a client or a party, or causes interference or potential interference with a legal proceeding. The appropriate sanction will depend on the Lawyer’s mental state and the seriousness of the injury or potential injury to a client or a party, or the degree of interference or potential interference with a legal proceeding.

(3) Admonition is generally appropriate when a Lawyer negligently abuses the legal process in an isolated instance and causes little or no actual or potential injury to a party, or causes little or no actual or potential interference with a legal proceeding.

(c) Improper communications with individuals in the legal system. The following sanctions are generally appropriate when a Lawyer attempts to influence a judge, juror, prospective juror, or other official by means prohibited by law in violation of Rule 3.5, 4.2, or 4.3:

(1) Delicensure is generally appropriate when a Lawyer:

(A) intentionally tampers with a witness and causes serious or potentially serious injury to a party, or causes significant or potentially significant interference with the outcome of the legal proceeding;

(B) makes an ex parte communication with a judge or juror with intent to affect the outcome of the proceeding, and causes serious or potentially serious injury to a party, or causes significant or potentially significant interference with the outcome of the legal proceeding; or

(C) improperly communicates with someone in the legal system other than a witness, judge, or juror with the intent to influence or affect the outcome of the proceeding, and causes significant or potentially significant interference with the outcome of the legal proceeding.

(2) Suspension is generally appropriate when a Lawyer engages in communication with an individual in the legal system when the Lawyer knows that such communication is improper, and causes injury or potential injury to a party or causes interference or potential interference with the outcome of the legal proceeding.

(3) Reprimand is generally appropriate when a Lawyer is negligent in determining whether it is proper to engage in communication with an individual in the legal system, and causes injury or potential injury to a party or interference or potential interference with the outcome of the legal proceeding.

(4) Admonition is generally appropriate when a Lawyer engages in an isolated instance of negligence in improperly communicating with an individual in the legal system, and causes little or no: (A) actual or potential injury to a party, or (B) actual or potential interference with the outcome of the legal proceeding.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
b6a2e10bb06175f14cf234deb26fa0ee808bd0fe310265381e3747eafc9792fa
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Utah Sup. Ct. R. Prof'l Prac. 1-585 — Presumptive san… · binding.law