Bindinglaw

UT · rules

Utah Sup. Ct. R. Prof'l Prac. 1-107

Open and Public Meetings

activein force · 2023-11-01 – presentact-effective-date

Intent:

To establish procedures for the Supreme Court’s committees to conduct open and public meetings.

To establish procedures consistent with the philosophy of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.

To provide the Supreme Court with sufficient flexibility to close meetings when discussing matters of a sensitive nature.

Applicability:

This rule shall apply to Supreme Court advisory committees, ad hoc committees, and oversight committees. This rule does not apply to the Supreme Court’s Ethics and Discipline Committee, the Supreme Court’s Professionalism and Civility Counseling Board, or committees of the Utah State Bar. Statement of the Rule:

(a) Public notice of meetings. Each Supreme Court committee must post their annual meeting schedule. At least 24 hours before each meeting, the committee must post on its website the meeting agenda and location. If the meeting will be held virtually, the committee must post the link to join at least 24 hours before each meeting.

(b) Open meetings. Meetings of Supreme Court committees are open to the public unless closed as provided in this section.

(c) Prohibition on closing specific meetings. The following Supreme Court committees must hold only open meetings:

(1) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Appellate Procedure;

(2) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Business and Chancery Procedure;

(3) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Civil Procedure;

(4) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Criminal Procedure;

(5) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Evidence;

(6) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Juvenile Procedure; and

(7) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Professional Conduct.

(d) Reasons for closed meetings. Supreme Court committees may close an otherwise open meeting:

(1) to discuss legal advice of counsel;

(2) to discuss an individual’s character, professional competence, or physical or mental health;

(3) to discuss applications containing private information;

(4) to discuss information that is designated as a trade secret; or

(5) for any other allowable reason found in the Open and Public Meetings Act, or Rule 2-103 of the Code of Judicial Administration;

(e) Limit on actions at a closed meeting. No contract, appointment, rule, application, or resolution may be approved at a closed committee meeting. A contract, appointment, rule, application, or resolution approved at an open meeting may be based upon discussions had at a closed meeting.

History

Comment Supreme Court Committees [1] Supreme Court Committees include: (a) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Appellate Procedure (b) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Business and Chancery Procedure (c) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Civil Procedure (d) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Criminal Procedure (e) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Evidence (f) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Juvenile Procedure (g) the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Professional Conduct (h) the Board of Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (i) the Ethics and Discipline Committee (j) the Licensed Paralegal Practitioner Committee (k) the Legal Services Innovation Committee (l) the Oversight Committee for the Office of Professional Conduct (m) the Professionalism and Civility Counseling Board (n) the Standing Committee on Appellate Representation Note Adopted November 1, 2023

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
dc05d22e4328cac152ad62de21d7a3f9343a0607a5e7b4ea2c70c7ae7a95e6c2
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Utah Sup. Ct. R. Prof'l Prac. 1-107 — Open and Public… · binding.law