Bindinglaw

UT · rules

Utah Code Jud. Admin. R. 9-106

New judge certification procedure

activein force · 1999-11-01 – presentact-effective-date

Intent:

To establish the orientation and testing procedure to be followed in determining certification of proposed justice court judges.

Applicability:

This rule shall apply to all newly appointed justice court judges who are not already certified judges in other justice courts in Utah. This rule shall not apply to active senior justice court judges.

Statement of the Rule:

(1) The Council shall schedule three orientations each year. Upon receipt of written notification of the name of a proposed judge, both the proposed judge and the appointing authority shall be notified in writing of the date of the next orientation, and such notification shall include a copy of this rule.

(2) At least 10 days prior to the orientation, the proposed judge shall be sent a copy of the current Manual for Justice Court Judges.

(3) Prior to the orientation, the appointing authority shall assure, and shall notify the Council, that the proposed judge meets the statutory qualifications for office.

(4) The orientation shall cover substantive and procedural issues pertinent to justice courts as outlined in the Manual for Justice Court Judges.

(5) Upon completion of the orientation session, an examination shall be administered. In order to be certified, each proposed judge must attend all parts of the orientation and must answer at least 80% of the examination questions correctly.

(6) If a proposed judge fails to answer 80% of the questions correctly, that proposed judge shall have the opportunity to take another examination not sooner than 15 days after the orientation. The second examination shall be preceded by a substantive review of the first examination and an opportunity for additional instruction.

(7) A proposed judge who fails to answer 80% of the questions on the second examination correctly must wait until the next scheduled full orientation in order to be retested. The appointing authority shall be notified of the status of the proposed judge, and the provisions of paragraphs (5) and (6) above shall once again apply.

(8) Upon completion of the orientation process, the Justice Court Administrator shall make a recommendation to the Council respecting certification. The Council shall either certify that the proposed judge has attended the orientation and successfully passed the examination, or decline to certify the same. The Council shall notify the proposed judge and the appointing authority of its decision in writing.

(9) The Council may waive any of the non-statutory requirements above for good cause shown.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
c9ac0461e4a19a137e63ddfe1163e61656daa95c55fa78c41931a37ad836ed26
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Utah Code Jud. Admin. R. 9-106 — New judge certificat… · binding.law