UT · rules
Utah Code Jud. Admin. R. 2-207
Annual rulemaking and periodic review of the Code
Intent:
To establish an annual schedule for the study, review and adoption of Council and Board rules.
To assure the timely periodic review of Council policies for continued applicability.
Applicability:
This rule shall apply to the judiciary.
Statement of the Rule:
(1) Annual rulemaking procedure.
(A) At least once a year, the Council shall publish rules for comment under Rule 2-203.
(B) The Boards of Judges, the standing and ad hoc Committees of the Council or any other interested individual may submit a written request to the Council, through the office of General Counsel, requesting the adoption, modification or repeal of a Council rule. The request shall set forth the proposed rule or amendment or the text of the rule proposed for repeal and shall specify the need for and anticipated effect of the proposal.
(2) Periodic review of the Code.
(A) The Policy and Planning Committee shall adopt a schedule which ensures that the rules contained in this Code are reviewed on a periodic basis but a minimum of once every five years.
(B) Review of the Code shall be for the purpose of determining the continuing viability, utility and practicality of the rules.
(C) Rules which are outdated or inconsistent with other rules, legislation or preferred practice shall be modified, amended or repealed.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
aff0c107b66bbd7367344fdfc84c2bbd74cdd32b60e756f63b06ae4f79107c4e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.