Bindinglaw

UT · jury_instructions

MUJI 2d CV931

Easement by Necessity. Elements of a claim for access to landlocked property.

activein force · 2026-08-21 – presentas-observed

To succeed on this claim, [Plaintiff] must prove by clear and convincing evidence each of the following elements:

(1) All of the property was once owned by a single landowner who then divided the land and transferred away one tract of land, creating a landlocked property; and

(2) The easement is reasonably necessary to the enjoyment of the landlocked property.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-22
Edition
2026-08-21
Content hash
2a1199c992b4b2b2d57dfc02f046d668d6402093fbb342c7c7b7c162793d9a04
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.