UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV905
Exception to Silence Equaling Acquiescence
[Name of defendant] asserts that [he or she] did not acquiesce to the boundary on the basis that [he or she] could not access [his or her] property. If [name of defendant] proves shows by a preponderance of the evidence that [he or she] could not access [his or her] property, then you must find that [name of defendant] did not acquiesce to the boundary.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
0b360f51e845668e52a33fd7fcba40e9ea05973a159b06542052437636526221
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.