UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV904
Mutual Acquiescence
Mutual acquiescence as used in the third requirement of boundary by acquiescence means that adjoining landowners have acted in a manner that shows they have treated a line as a boundary of their properties. The [name of defendant]'s acquiescence can be shown by action, inaction, or silence. Direct evidence of a landowner's subjective belief concerning the boundary is not required to show acquiescence. Rather, you should base your decision on whether [name of defendant]'s objective behavior shows [he or she] recognized the line as a property line. You may infer acquiescence from the evidence.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
5ebc865d04fef64e613bb52a073e3042b68e2788f3d0fe31de68eab6c7a6a309
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.