UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV901
Boundary by Acquiescence
[Name of plaintiff] and [name of defendant] are adjoining landowners. There is a dispute over where the legal property line is between the adjoining pieces of property. [Name of plaintiff] claims that a visible [fence, monument, building, or natural features treated as a boundary] between [name of plaintiff]'s property and [name of defendant]'s property is a "boundary by acquiescence," that should be recognized as the legal boundary between the properties.
To establish [name of plaintiff]'s claim of boundary by acquiescence, [he or she] must prove each of the following elements by clear and convincing evidence:
1. There is a visible line between [name of plaintiff]'s property and [name of defendant]'s property that is marked by a [fence, monument, building, or natural features treated as a boundary];
2. The past or present owners of [name of plaintiff]'s property occupied [name of plaintiff]'s property up to the visible line in a manner that would give a reasonable landowner notice that the past or present owners of [name of plaintiff]'s property were using the line as a boundary;
3. The past or present owners of [name of plaintiff] and [name of defendant]'s properties mutually acquiesced to in the line as a boundary between the properties; and
4. For a continuous period of at least 20 years without interruption.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
6d4b0c4d1ebd48a7df3c66da06393621b11bc0cdab474483006c54901f0dbbee
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.