UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV507
Breach of warranty essential elements.
To prove breach of warranty [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
(1) [name of defendant] made a warranty [describe warranty]; and
(2) [name of plaintiff] relied on the warranty; and
(3) [name of defendant] reasonably expected that [name of plaintiff] would rely on the warranty; and
(4) [name of defendant]'s services were not as promised in the warranty; and
(5) [name of defendant]'s breach of warranty caused [name of plaintiff]'s harm; and
(6) it was reasonably foreseeable at the time the warranty was made that [name of plaintiff] would be harmed if [name of defendant]'s services were not performed as promised in the warranty.
[To establish breach of an express warranty, [name of plaintiff] does not also have to prove that the [name of defendant] breached the standard of care.]
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
78d7a11a8441efe7eb4830e26202188e6aa8eb058e6cc4cf8eed92ab59fb2280
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.