UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV501
Standard of care for design professionals.
A[n] [architect] [landscape architect] [engineer] [land surveyor] is required to use the same degree of learning, care, and skill ordinarily used by other [architects] [landscape architects] [engineers] [land surveyors] under like circumstances. This is known as the "standard of care." The law does not require perfect [plans/drawings/services] or satisfactory results but rather requires compliance with the standard of care.
[The "applicable standard of care" is the standard of care existing at the time of [name of defendant]'s services and in the same or similar locality as where [name of defendant]'s services were performed.]
The failure to follow the standard of care is a form of fault known as "professional malpractice." [Name of defendant] is a[n] [architect] [landscape architect] [engineer] [land surveyor]. To establish professional malpractice by [name of defendant], [name of plaintiff] has the burden of proving three things:
(1) what the standard of care is;
(2) that [name of defendant] failed to follow this standard of care; and
(3) that this failure to follow the standard of care was the cause of [name of plaintiff]'s harm.
In this case, [name of plaintiff] alleges that [name of defendant] failed to follow the standard of care in the following respects:
(1)
(2)
(3)
If you decide that [name of defendant] failed to follow the standard of care in any of these respects, then you must determine whether that failure was the cause of [name of plaintiff]'s harm and, if so, the amount of the harm.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
a75442f7c1d0381fabb9ef3a24d42bd2623762759876840eab4a0444b9da2e7a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.