Bindinglaw

UT · jury_instructions

MUJI 2d CV328

Common knowledge and need for expert testimony.

activein force · 2026-08-21 – presentas-observed

Expert testimony is not needed to establish the [standard of care/cause] if the medical procedure is of a kind, or the outcome so offends commonly held notions of proper medical treatment, that the [standard of care/cause] can be established by the common knowledge, experience and understanding of jurors.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-22
Edition
2026-08-21
Content hash
001bdcdb134dbca0a557c1567f8a797d5b8b2c9f0a2346e9e945aa9402d288cf
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.