UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV305
Duty to refer.
If [name of defendant] knew or should have known that [he] did not possess the necessary expertise to properly treat [name of plaintiff]'s condition, and a referral to another who has the appropriate expertise could reasonably have been made under the circumstances, then [name of defendant] had a duty to offer that referral.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
a4567c1e3e811435a42a1e5c23ea1d3f61b0916e6c7a94eade1e0d2abfe21020
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.