UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2807
Scope of employment; travel to and from work.
Traveling to and from work is usually not within the scope of employment. [Name of plaintiff] claims that, [name of employee]'s [describe act or omission] while traveling to or from work is within the scope of employment. To succeed on this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove that:
(1) [name of employer] benefited from the travel other than just in [name of employee]'s presence at work; or
(2) [name of employer] had control over [name of employee]'s conduct during [his] travel.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
4f3afb36a6b79e17ac5b99ca21fd96325425f784bb51fecad24002645c7f9220
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.