UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2618
Access.
[Name of condemnor] may regulate access to and from the public roads to promote the general welfare, but must provide [name of property owner] with reasonable access to [his] property. Access may be reasonable even though it is not the most direct or convenient access. The right of reasonable access does not include a right to access at a specific location on the property, or from a specific road or intersection, or in a specific direction.
If you find that [name of property owner] does not have reasonable access to [his] remaining property after the taking, then you must consider this change in access in determining severance damages. If you find that [name of property owner] has reasonable access after the taking, then you must disregard this change in access in determining severance damages.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
13942a2c42e8fc038fa4c905178131413f1f6c07fedba4126d4dbbfb6f4acd96
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.