UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2234
Termination for convenience.
[Name of owner] claims [he] had the right to terminate the contract for [his] convenience. I have found that the contract gives [name of owner] the right to terminate the contract for [his] convenience. To succeed on this claim, [name of owner] must further prove that:
(1) [name of owner] did not breach the contract in any important way before [he] gave [name of contractor] notice of the termination for convenience; and
(2) [name of owner] exercised [his] right to terminate the contract for convenience in good faith.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
6770bf0b3a42b7b16a812732e27b39edd44d0ffc4f0e0378aea1648cbbcdf110
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.