UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2233
Termination for cause.
[Name of owner] claims [he] had the right to terminate the contract because [name of contractor] breached the contract. To succeed on this claim, [name of owner] must prove that [he]:
(1) gave timely and adequate notice of the claimed breach to [name of contractor];
(2) gave [name of contractor] reasonable time to correct the breach [as required by the contract];
(3) had not breached the contract in any important way at the time of termination; and
(4) [name of contractor] had not already substantially performed the contract.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
ebfb23ce6fe25aafd3df2b88910c5b4bca03ef25e25f3d491adebb1f6d05f79a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.