UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2229
Contractor's liability for breach of warranty of workmanship and habitability.
[Name of owner] claims that the new residence [he] purchased from [name of builder/developer] is defective and [name of builder/developer] has breached the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability. To succeed on this claim [name of owner] must prove that:
(1) [he] purchased a new residence from [name of builder/developer];
(2) the residence contained a defect that first became noticeable after [name of owner] purchased the residence;
(3) the defect was caused by improper design, material, or workmanship; and
(4) the defect made the residence unsafe or unfit for human habitation.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
d78033cc638caa82a447b123e73c3c3feea4c40246ba1a2227ac2599638dbf30
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.