UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2228
Right to suspend work due to interference.
[Name of contractor] claims that [he] suspended the work because of interference by [name of owner]. To succeed on this claim, [name of contractor] must prove that:
(1) [name of owner] or [events within [name of owner's] control] unreasonably interfered with [name of contractor]'s performance of [his] work; and
(2) the interference was for an unreasonable period of time.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
f0421dfaab02a8434568d830555cf7ea17db4f02c0bf490e0f24bd98e7c4d27e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.