UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2222
Contractor's claim for time. Delay not caused by the contractor.
[Name of contractor] claims [he] was entitled to more time to perform the work because of an excusable delay. To succeed on this claim, [name of contractor] must prove that the events causing the delay:
(1) were beyond [name of contractor]'s control;
(2) were not reasonably foreseeable by [name of contractor] at the time the contract was made; and
(3) prevented [name of contractor] from meeting the contract deadline.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
54adb66c538046a8d717c71f0ce5eb50539a00b1d6f816f19e1a0851df4b844e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.